Page 188 - Advanced Gas Turbine Cycles
P. 188

I54                       Advanced gas turbine cycles

            Bannister et al. [ 101 made a study of the hydrogen fuelled CCGT plant (Cycle C2),
         with  a  closed  upper  ‘gas turbine’  cycle  (Fig.  8.16).  A  number of  different working
         fluids were used  in  the  latter, the  water produced  in  combustion being separated and
         extracted  downstream  of  the  HRSG.  Again  there  is  relatively  little  variation  of
         efficiency  with  choice  of  the  upper  cycle  working  fluid,  each  of  which  has  some
         practical limitations, but that with  steam as the working fluid offers highest efficiency,
         approaching 60% (HHV).
            Bannister et al. then considered a novel  ‘Rankine’ type hydrogen fired cycle (Cycle
         C3), as  shown in  Fig.  8.17. Low  pressure  wet  steam leaving the  turbine in  the  ‘gas
         turbine’ upper cycle then enters the hot  side of the HRSG. After leaving the HRSG as
         wetter  steam  this  mainstream  flow  enters  the  condenser.  After  condensation,  some
         water, equal in  mass flow to that produced in combustion (m per unit flow at entry), is
         then discharged. The rest (unit) flow is pumped back into the cold side of the HRSG to
         receive heat from the (1 + m) wet steam stream. Within the HRSG, this unit water flow
         passes through
          (a)  an economiser,
          (b)  an evaporator to leave as saturated steam, and
          (c)  a  superheater  to  impart  a  margin  of  superheat before  entry  to  the  combustion
              chamber.
            This superheated steam then acts as a moderator for the hydrogedoxygen combustion,
         which  takes  place  at  high  pressure,  166 bar  in  the  original  study.  Two  subsequent
         reconfigurations of the cycle changed this high pressure to 365 and 250 bar, respectively,
         the same general cycle approach being followed but with some added cooling streams. The
         Westinghouse group concluded that a cycle efficiency of 60% (HHV) could be achieved
         with this Rankine type cycle.
            Further detailed  studies of  several complex hydrogen fuelled  cycles, including the
         ‘Rankine’ cycle  C3,  have  been  made  by  Japanese  authors, e.g.  Sugisita et  al.  [l I].
         Their preference is for a  ‘topping/extraction’ cycle. In this cycle, the mainstream flow
         from the combustor in the upper cycle, after passing through an HP steam turbine, gets
         cooled in the first of the two heat exchangers, from a superheated state to the saturation
         condition. The flow is then  split, one stream expanding further to condenser pressure,
         with  the combustion product water flow (m) being discharged. The  remainder of  this
         stream is pumped up, recuperated by the second of  the two heat exchangers, expanded
         again in another turbine and then mixed with the remaining topping cycle flow. Sugisita
         et  a]. claim over 60% efficiency for this so-called Jericha cycle.



         8.6.4.  Cycles with modiJcation of  the oxidant in Combustion
            We next consider a number of plants in which the combustion process is modified by
         changing the oxidation of the fuel, Table 8.ID and Figs. 8.18-8.20.  The first group (DI,
         D2 and D3) are plants with Ginsufficient air is supplied to the Po reactor, less than that
         required to produce stoichiometric combustion. The second group (D4, D5 and D6) are
         plants where air is replaced as the oxidant by pure oxygen which is assumed to be available
         from an air separation plant.
   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193