Page 1099 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 1099

1084              is believed to be planar with a barrier to rotation of the double bond with respect to the
                                              10
                       ring of at least 3–4 kcal/mol. The decay time for the S styrene is in the nanosecond
                                                                    1
     CHAPTER 12                                                  11
                       range, which is considerably longer than for ethene.  The S excited state of styrene
                                                                        2
     Photochemistry    is a zwitterionic structure similar to the S state for ethene. In this case, as might be
                                                         1
                       expected, the terminal methylene group is pyramidalized, with the cationic character
                       associated with the phenyl-substituted carbon. The T state is quinoid in character
                                                                   1
                       with a shortened bond between the benzene ring and the double bond. T involves
                                                                                    2
                       a triplet configuration of the benzene   electrons. Valence bond representations are
                       shown below.

                                                                                δ–


                                                                               δ+



                                  S 0        T 1         T 2        S 1        S 2
                                       Valence Bond Representation of Excited States of Styrene





                           The geometries and energetics of the styrene excited states have been calcu-
                                                ∗
                       lated at the CAS-SCF/6-31G level using all the   orbitals of styrene and are
                       given in Figure 12.7. 12  The changes in bond length relative to the ground state
                       indicate the nature of the excited states. Figure 12.7 shows the computed struc-
                       tures and energies of the excited states and indicates the singlet-singlet and singlet-
                       triplet intersections. The T →T internal conversion, which involves transfer of triplet
                                            2   1
                       character from the benzene ring to the ethylene bond, is efficient. The T →S 0
                                                                                        1
                       intersection, labeled ISC , is considered to be inefficient because of small spin-
                                            c
                       orbit coupling. This conversion is believed to occur in time range 20–100 ns. 13
                       This appears to be the slowest step in the decay sequence from the triplet excited
                       state. Return to the ground state in the singlet manifold can occur from the
                       ISC intersection. The styrene conical intersection appears to be similar to that
                          b
                       for ethene and to involve both twisting and pyramidalization. 14  As Figure 12.7
                       suggests, there is considerable complexity to the styrene excited state surface. The
                       introduction of the second chromophore, the benzene ring, introduces new issues


                        10
                          J. I. Seeman, V. H. Grassian, and E. R. Bernstein, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110, 8542 (1988); V. H.
                          Grassian, E. R. Bernstein, H. V. Secor, and J. I. Seeman, J. Phys. Chem., 93, 3470 (1989); J. A. Syage,
                          F. Al Adel, and A. H. Zewail, Chem. Phys. Lett., 103, 15 (1983).
                        11   D. A. Condirston and J. D. Laposa, Chem. Phys. Lett., 63, 313 (1979).
                        12
                          M. J. Bearpack, M. Olivucci, S. Wilsey, F. Bernardi, and M. A. Robb, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 6944
                          (1995).
                        13   R. Bonneau, J. Photochem., 10, 439 (1979); R. A. Caldwell, L. D. Jacobs, T. R. Furlani, E. A. Nalley,
                          and J. Laboy, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 1623 (1992).
                        14
                          V. Molina, M. Merchan, B. O. Roos, and P.-A. Malmqvist, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2, 2211
                          (2000).
   1094   1095   1096   1097   1098   1099   1100   1101   1102   1103   1104