Page 188 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 188

168               attractive as the separation approaches the sum of their van der Waals radii, but then
                       becomes strongly repulsive as the separation becomes less than the sum of their van
     CHAPTER 2
                       der Waal radii. The attractive interaction results from a mutual polarization of the
     Stereochemistry,  electrons of the atoms. Such attractive forces are called London forces or dispersion
     Conformation,
     and Stereoselectivity  forces and are relatively weak interactions. London forces vary inversely with the
                       sixth power of internuclear distance and become negligible as internuclear separation
                       increases. At distances smaller than the sum of the van der Waals radii, the much
                       stronger electron-electron repulsive forces are dominant. Electrostatic forces must take
                       into account bond dipoles and their orientation. Bond dipoles also have a polarizing
                       effect on adjacent groups. 89
                           The separation of the total strain energy into component elements of bond length
                       strain, bond angle strain, torsional strain, and nonbonded interactions is useful for
                       analysis of structural and steric effects on equilibria and reactivity. Minimization of
                       the total strain energy of a molecule, expressed by a parameterized equation for each
                       of the force fields, can be accomplished by iterative computation. The quantitative
                       application of molecular mechanics for calculation of minimum energy geometries,
                       heats of formation, and strain energies has been developed to a high level of reliability.
                       The method has been refined to the point that geometries of saturated hydrocarbons

                       can be calculated to an accuracy of 0.005 Å in bond length and 1 in bond angle. 90
                       Similar accuracy can be obtained for unsaturated hydrocarbons 91  and molecules with
                       oxygen functional groups. 92  Molecular mechanics calculations can also be applied to
                       unstable reactive intermediates such as carbocations. 93
                           The molecular mechanics computations can be done using commercially available
                       programs. The parameters used in the programs determine the range of applicability
                       and reliability of the results. Several systems of parameters and equations for carrying
                       out the calculations have been developed. The most frequently used methods in organic
                       chemistry are those developed by N. L. Allinger and co-workers and is frequently
                       referred to as MM (molecular mechanics) calculations. 94  The most recent version is
                       called MM4. 95  The computations involve iterations to locate an energy minimum.
                       Precautions must be taken to establish that a true (“global”) minimum, as opposed
                       to a local minimum energy, has been achieved. This can be accomplished by using
                       a number of different initial geometries and comparing the structures and energies of
                       the minima that are located. In addition to comparing the relative energy of various
                       conformations of an individual molecule, MM computations can be used to calculate
                       total molecular energy (enthalpy of formation) to a high level of accuracy. Heats of
                       formation for most hydrocarbons are accurate to ±0	5kcal/mol. This application of
                       MM is discussed further in Section 3.1.2.4.


                        89	  L. Dosen-Micovic, D. Jeremic, and N. L. Allinger, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 105, 1716, 1723 (1983);
                          B. Mannfors, K. Palmo, and S. Krimm, J. Mol. Struct., 556, 1 (2000).
                        90
                          N. L. Allinger, Y. H. Yuh, and J.-H. Lii, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111, 8551 (1989); N. L. Allinger, K. Chen,
                          and J.-H. Lii, J. Comput. Chem., 17, 642 (1996).
                        91	  N. Nevins, K. Chen, and N. L. Allinger, J. Comput. Chem., 17, 669 (1996); N. Nevins, J.-H. Lii, and
                          N. L. Allinger, J. Comput. Chem., 17, 695 (1996); N. Nevins and N. L. Allinger, J. Comput. Chem.,
                          17, 730 (1996).
                        92
                          C. H. Langley, J. H. Lii, and N. L. Allinger, J. Comput. Chem., 22, 1396, 1426, 1451 (2001).
                        93
                          B. Reindl, T. Clark, and P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Comput. Chem., 17, 1406 (1996); B. Reindl and
                          P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Comput. Chem., 18, 28 (1997); B. Reindl, T. Clark, and P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Comput.
                          Chem., 18, 533 (1997); B. Reindl, T. Clark, and P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Phys. Chem. A, 102, 8953 (1998).
                        94	  N. L. Allinger, Y. H. Yuh and J.-H. Lii, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 111, 8551 (1989).
                        95
                          N. L. Allinger, K. S. Chen, and J. H. Lii, J. Comput. Chem., 17, 642 (1996).
   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193