Page 506 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 506

Table 5.2. Relative Reactivity of Alkenes toward Halogenation            487
                                                 Relative reactivity                      SECTION 5.3

                    Alkene          Chlorination a  Bromination b  Bromination c      Addition of Halogens
               Ethene                               0.01            0.0045
               1-Butene              1.00           1.00            1.00
               3,3-Dimethyl-1-butene  1.15          0.27            1.81
               Z-2-Butene            63             27              173
               E-2-Butene            50             17.5            159
               2-Methylpropene       58             57              109
               2-Methyl-2-butene     1 1×10 4       1 38×10 4
               2,3-Dimethyl-2-butene  4 3×10 5      19 0×10 4
               a. M. L. Poutsma, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 87, 4285 (1965), in excess alkene.
               b. J. E. Dubois and G. Mouvier, Bull. Chim. Soc. Fr., 1426 (1968), in methanol.
               c. A. Modro, G. H. Schmid, and K. Yates, J. Org. Chem. 42, 3673 (1977), in ClCH 2 CH 2 Cl.


                           ‡
                   ‡
          where  G and  G are the free energies of activation for the third- and second-order
                   3       2
          processes, respectively. 41c  These correlations suggest that the two mechanisms must
          be very similar.
              Observed bromination rates are very sensitive to common impurities such as
                                                                  43
              42
          HBr and water, which can assist in formation of the bromonium ion. It is likely that
          under normal preparative conditions, where these impurities are likely to be present,
          these catalytic mechanisms may dominate.
              Chlorination generally exhibits second-order kinetics, first-order in both alkene
          and chlorine. 44  The relative reactivities of some alkenes toward chlorination and
          bromination are given in Table 5.2. The reaction rate increases with alkyl substi-
          tution, as would be expected for an electrophilic process. The magnitude of the rate
          increase is quite large, but not as large as for protonation. The relative reactivities
          are solvent dependent. 45  Quantitative interpretation of the solvent effect using the
          Winstein-Grunwald Y values indicates that the TS has a high degree of ionic character.
          The Hammett correlation for bromination of styrenes is best with 
 +  substituent
          constants, and gives 
 =−4 8. 46  All these features are in accord with an electrophilic
          mechanism.
              Stereochemical studies provide additional information pertaining to the
          mechanism of halogenation. The results of numerous stereochemical studies can be
          generalized as follows: For brominations, anti addition is preferred for alkenes lacking
          substituent groups that can strongly stabilize a carbocation intermediate. 47  When the
          alkene is conjugated with an aryl group, the extent of syn addition increases and can
          become the dominant pathway. Chlorination is not as likely to be as stereospecific as
          bromination, but tends to follow the same pattern. Some specific results are given in
          Table 5.3.
           42
             C. J. A. Byrnell, R. G. Coombes, L. S. Hart, and M. C. Whiting, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2  1079
             (1983); L. S. Hart and M. C. Whiting, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1087 (1983).
           43   V. V. Smirnov, A. N. Miroshnichenko, and M. I. Shilina, Kinet. Catal., 31, 482, 486 (1990).
           44
             G. H. Schmid, A. Modro, and K. Yates, J. Org. Chem., 42, 871 (1977).
           45
             F. Garnier and J -E. Dubois, Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr., 3797 (1968); F. Garnier, R. H. Donnay, and
             J. -E. Dubois, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 829 (1971); M.-F. Ruasse and J. -E. Dubois, J. Am.
             Chem. Soc., 97, 1977 (1975); A. Modro, G. H. Schmid, and K. Yates, J. Org. Chem., 42, 3673 (1977).
           46   K. Yates, R. S. McDonald, and S. A. Shapiro, J. Org. Chem., 38, 2460 (1973).
           47
             J. R. Chretien, J.-D. Coudert, and M.-F. Ruasse, J. Org. Chem., 58, 1917 (1993).
   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511