Page 736 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part A - Structure and Mechanisms, 5th ed (2007) - Carey _ Sundberg
P. 736

both bond length alternation and bond stretching into consideration. The aromaticity  719
          index HOMA is formulated as
                                                                                          SECTION 8.1

                                                 2              2                    Criteria of Aromaticity
                         HOMA = 1− 
  R opt  − R av    +    R av  − R i      (8.1)
                                                     n
          where R is average bond length, R  is the optimum bond length, R is an individual
                 av                     opt                       i
          bond length, n is the number of bonds, and   is a constant such that HOMA is equal
          to zero for a single localized structure. The HOMA equation can be rewritten as
                                                          2
                                HOMA = 1−        R opt  −R i                (8.2)
                                            n
          The R opt  values are derived from butadiene, which is thereby the implicit standard of
          the definition. For C−C bonds,  = 257.7 Å −2  and R opt  = 1 388 Å. Further definition
          of bond lengths is required for structures with heteroatoms.
              In the formulation in Equation (8.1), the first term, the deviation from the optimum
          length, accounts for the energy associated with bond length effects, and the second term,
          which reflects deviation from the average, accounts for bond alternation. The HOMA
          energy and alternation terms have been calculated for many aromatic compounds. 15
          The values for benzene, naphthalene, anthracene, and phenanthrene are shown below. 16
          Note the decrease as the molecules get larger. HOMA indices can also be assigned
          to the individual rings in polycyclic structures. A relatively low HOMA is assigned
          to the center ring in phenanthrene. We will see later that this is in accord with other
          properties of phenanthrene. In contrast, the center ring in anthracene has a slightly
          higher index than the terminal rings.

                                                                    0.870
                   0.991         0.787                           0.458
                                               0.723  0.632
                  0.991       0.811            0.718            0.741

              Another aromaticity index based on bond lengths was devised by Bird. 17  The
          input into the index are bond order values derived from bond lengths. (See Section
          1.4.6 to review the relationship between bond length and bond order.) The formulation
          of the index is



                                 V     100      N −N  2        a
                      I = 100 1−   V =                 and N =    −b        (8.3)
                                V       N        n             R
                                 k                              2
          where N is the arithmetic mean of bond orders. V is the value of V for the corre-
                                                    k
          sponding localized structures, and a and b are constants for each bond type.
              The index I is assigned as 100 for benzene. The values are scaled for ring size and
                        A
          ring fusions, and increase with ring size so that naphthalene (142) and anthracene (206)
          have higher indices than benzene. This method is particularly useful for comparing
          heterocyclic compounds with hydrocarbons (see Section 8.6).

           15   T. M. Krygowski and M. Cyranski, Tetrahedron, 52, 1713 (1996).
           16   M. K. Cyranski, B. T. Stepien, and T. M. Krygowski, Tetrahedron, 56, 9663 (2000).
           17
             C. W. Bird, Tetrahedron, 41, 1409 (1985); C. W. Bird, Tetrahedron, 48, 335 (1992); C. W. Bird,
             Tetrahedron, 52, 9945 (1996); C. W. Bird, Tetrahedron, 54, 4641 (1998).
   731   732   733   734   735   736   737   738   739   740   741