Page 212 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part B - Reactions & Synthesis
P. 212

184              When the EWG is a carbonyl group, there can be competition with 1,2-addition, which
                       is especially likely for aldehydes but can also occur with ketones. With successively less
      CHAPTER 2
                       reactive carbonyl groups, 1,4-addition becomes more favorable. Highly reactive, hard
      Reactions of Carbon  nucleophiles tend to favor 1,2-addition and the reaction is irreversible if the nucleophile
      Nucleophiles with
      Carbonyl Compounds  is a poor leaving group. For example with organometallic reagents, 1,2-addition is
                       usually observed and it is irreversible because there is no tendency to expel an alkyl
                       anion. Section 2.6.5 considers some exceptions in which organometallic reagents are
                       added in the 1,4-manner. With less basic nucleophiles, the 1,2-addition is more easily
                       reversible and the 1,4-addition product is usually more stable.


                        O  R         O –        – O                O                O –  R  O
                       RC  C  CHCH     CR″      RC  CR 2  +  R′CH  CHCR″    R′CH  CHC  C  CR

                           R  R′                                                    R″ R
                                1,4-addition                                      1,2-addition

                           Retrosynthetically, there are inherently two possible approaches to the products
                       of conjugate addition as represented below, where Y and Z represent two different
                       anion-stabilizing groups.

                                                               H
                              –                                                         –
                                                                                   2
                          Y  CHR 1  +  CH 2  C  Z  Y  CH  CH 2  C  Z   Y  C  CH 2  +  R CH  Z
                                          R 2         R 1      R 2        R 1

                       When a catalytic amount of base is used, the most effective nucleophiles are enolates
                       derived from relatively acidic compounds such as  -ketoesters or malonate esters.
                       The adduct anions are more basic than the nucleophile and are protonated under the
                       reaction conditions.

                        – O   H                           O  R         S–H
                                   +  R                          EWG            O   R
                         X   Z             EWG          X       –             X         EWG
                                                            Z
                         less basic                           more basic          Z


                           Scheme 2.23 provides some examples of conjugate addition reactions. Entry 1
                       illustrates the tendency for reaction to proceed through the more stable enolate. Entries
                       2 to 5 are typical examples of addition of doubly stabilized enolates to electrophilic
                       alkenes. Entries 6 to 8 are cases of addition of nitroalkanes. Nitroalkanes are compa-
                       rable in acidity to  -ketoesters (see Table 1.1) and are often excellent nucleophiles
                       for conjugate addition. Note that in Entry 8 fluoride ion is used as the base. Entry 9
                       is a case of adding a zinc enolate (Reformatsky reagent) to a nitroalkene. Entry 10
                       shows an enamine as the carbon nucleophile. All of these reactions were done under
                       equilibrating conditions.
                           The fluoride ion is an effective catalyst for conjugate additions involving relatively
                       acidic carbon nucleophiles. 292  The reactions can be done in the presence of excess

                       292
                          J. H. Clark, Chem. Rev., 80, 429 (1980).
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217