Page 216 - Advanced Organic Chemistry Part B - Reactions & Synthesis
P. 216

188              enolate addition to acceptors with two anion-stabilizing groups. Entry 8 is noteworthy
                       in that it creates two contiguous quaternary carbons. Entry 9 shows an addition of
      CHAPTER 2        an amide anion. Entry 10 is a case of an enolate stabilized by both the dithiane ring
      Reactions of Carbon  and ester substituent. The acceptor, an  , -unsaturated lactam, is relatively unreactive
      Nucleophiles with
      Carbonyl Compounds  but the addition is driven forward by formation of a new   bond. The chiral moiety
                       incorporated into the five-membered ring promotes enantioselective formation of the
                       new stereocenter.
                           There have been several studies of the stereochemistry of conjugate addition
                       reactions. If there are substituents on both the nucleophilic enolate and the acceptor,
                       either syn or anti adducts can be formed.

                                O –          O          O   R 3  O         O   R 3  O
                             R 1     +  R 3    R 4    R 1          R 4  +  R 1       R 4
                                  R 2                      R 2               R 2
                                                             syn               anti
                       The reaction shows a dependence on the E-or Z-stereochemistry of the enolate.
                       Z-enolates favor anti adducts and E-enolates favor syn adducts. These tendencies
                       can be understood in terms of an eight-membered chelated TS. 299  The enone in this
                       TS is in an s-cis conformation. The stereochemistry is influenced by the s-cis/s-
                                            4
                       trans equilibria. Bulky R groups favor the s-cis conformer and enhance the stereo-
                       selectivity of the reaction. A computational study on the reaction also suggested an
                       eight-membered TS. 300

                                      R 4            R 4                  3
                                          O             O  O         O   R   O
                                   R 2  O Li      R 2                           4
                                          R 1             R 1     R 1          R
                                  R 3    H        R 3   H              R 2
                                      H              H
                                         Z-enolate                       anti
                                      R 4             R 4                 R 3
                                          O              O            O       O
                                   H    O  Li     H     O           1           R 4
                                          R 1             R 1      R     2
                                  R 3    H        R 3   H               R
                                      R 2  E-enolate  R 2                 syn
                           The carbonyl functional groups are the most common both as activating EWG
                       substituents in the acceptor and as the anion-stabilizing group in the enolate, but several
                       other EWGs also undergo conjugate addition reactions. Nitroalkenes are excellent
                       acceptors. The nitro group is a strong EWG and there is usually no competition from
                       nucleophilic attack on the nitro group.
                                        O                        O
                                              1)  LDA, THF, –78°C       NO 2
                                              2)  CH 2  CHNO 2
                                               3)  pH4                    72%
                                                                                      Ref. 301
                       299   D. Oare and C. H. Heathcock, J. Org. Chem., 55, 157 (1990); D. A. Oare and C. H. Heathcock,
                          Top. Stereochem., 19, 227 (1989); A. Bernardi, Gazz. Chim. Ital., 125, 539 (1995).
                       300
                          A. Bernardi, A. M. Capelli, A. Cassinari, A. Comotti, C. Gennari, and C. Scolastico, J. Org. Chem.,
                          57, 7029 (1992).
                       301   R. J. Flintoft, J. C. Buzby, and J. A. Tucker, Tetrahedron Lett., 40, 4485 (1999).
   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221