Page 213 - Advances in Biomechanics and Tissue Regeneration
P. 213

208                  10. DETERMINATION OF THE ANISOTROPIC MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF BONE TISSUE

                                                       Constitutive Matrix Values
                                300

                                200

                                100

                                  0
                                     c      c     c      c     c     c      c     c      c
                                      11     12    13    21     22    23    31     32    33
                                        1×1  2×2  3×3  4×4  5×5  6×6  7×7  8×8  9×9  10×10
                                (A)
                                                      Constitutive Matrix Values
                                1000
                                 800
                                 600
                                 400
                                 200
                                   0
                                      c     c     c      c     c      c     c     c      c
                                      11     12    13     21    22    23     31    32    33
                                        1×1  2×2  3×3  4×4  5×5  6×6  7×7  8×8  9×9  10×10
                                (B)

                                                      Constitutive Matrix Values
                                 4000
                                 3000
                                 2000
                                 1000
                                   0
                                –1000
                                      c     c      c     c     c      c     c      c     c
                                       11    12    13     21    22    23     31    32     33
                                        1×1  2×2  3×3  4×4  5×5  6×6  7×7  8×8  9×9  10×10
                                (C)
           FIG. 10.9  Constitutive matrix values obtained using a unitary RVE and up to 10   10 repetitions. (A) Results for the benchmark 1 RVE with
           principal direction of 0 degrees. (B) Results for the benchmark 2 RVE with principal direction of 45 degrees. (C) Results for the trabecular RVE.









                                  (A)        (B)         (C)        (D)         (E)
           FIG. 10.10  Image rotation process and inherent morphologic change. (A) Original image; (B) 20 degrees rotation; (C) 40 degrees rotation;
           (D) 60 degrees rotation; (E) 80 degrees rotation.

                                h
           The acquisition of the σ eff , obtained for each analyzed RVE, using both FEM and NNRPIM methodologies (Fig. 10.13)
           provides the necessary data to validate the developed methodology. It is perceptible by this figure that by increasing
           the level of detail and the size of the heterogeneous RVE, the value of the homogenized stress decreases. Thus, when
           the analysis uses a heterogeneous model following a 4   4 repetition, the obtained homogenized stress is very close
           with the homogenized stress obtained with the homogeneous RVE, indicating that the presented homogenization
           technique is capable of accurately obtaining the homogenized orthotropic material properties of a trabecular patch.
           Comparing the FEM with the NNRPIM meshless method, despite the equivalent results in the homogeneous RVE,
           the results of heterogeneous RVEs are not so close. This difference in the results can be explained by the locking effects
           that occur in the FEM.



                                                       I. BIOMECHANICS
   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218