Page 189 - Applied Process Design For Chemical And Petrochemical Plants Volume II
P. 189

1 7%                     Applied Process Design for Chemical and Petrochemical Plants





                                                                                       :irculation
                                                                                        Zone








                                                                     a. Mechanism 1.







                                                                                      etrograde
                                                                                       Flow




                            A. Downcomer Weir.                       b. Mechanism 2.

                                                             B. Mechanisms of flow separation.
      Figure 8122. Modification of downcomer weir at tray floor outlet; (A) downcomer weir; (6) mechanism of flow separation. Used by permission,
      Biddulph, M. W. et al. The American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Cbern. Eng. Prog. V 89. No. 12 (1993), p. 56, all rights resewed.


         1. Set the  velocity of  the  unaerated  liquid  under  the
           downcomer to 1.6 ft/sec  (0.5 m/sec).
         2. Let  the liquid velocity under  the  downcomer equal
           the liquid velocity on the tray to give a smooth entry
           [2371.                                                                            owncomer Flood
         3. Hold the head loss due to the underflow clearance,
           hudc, to no more than 1.0-1.5 in. of hot liquid [117].
         4. Allow at least 3 sec residence time in the downcomer
           for disengagement of vapor for a nonfoaming system,
           and 6 sec for a foaming system [238] .”


         Figure 8-123 illustrates a typical sieve tray capacity chart.
       Entrainment by jet flooding or limitation by  downcomer                     Liquid Rate         *
       flooding are two of the main capacity limiting factors. The
       liquid backup in  the downcomer must balance  the pres-   Figure 8-123.  Sieve tray  capacity chart. Used by  permission, Bid-
       sure drop across the tray, with the process balance  [209].   dulph, M. W.,  et al. The American Institute of  Chemical Engineers,
                                                             Chem. Eng. Prog. V.  89 No. 12 (1 993), p. 56, all rights resewed.
       adhfd = hw + hli + hudc - h,                (8-253)
                                                             Hole Size and Spacing
      where  hfd = downcomer backup, in.
            hw =wet tray head loss, in.                        Most of the literature has presented data for trays with
             hli = clear liquid head at the inlet to tray, in.   holes of ?&in. through %-in. diameter. The work of Hunt et
            hudc  = head loss due to underflow clearance, in.   al. [33] includes Kin. holes. Some commercial units have
             h,  = head in the back of downcomer, in. (usually negli-   used  K  and  1-in. holes,  although  these  sizes should  be
                 gible except at high liquid load)           used with caution when adequate  data are not available.
             ad = mean aeration factor of froth, dimensionless (see   The recommended hole size for the average clean service
                 Figure 8-126)                               is  %-in. based on present  published  data.  Holes of  %in.
   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194