Page 106 - Artificial Intelligence for Computational Modeling of the Heart
P. 106

76  Chapter 2 Implementation of a patient-specific cardiac model




                                         we compared the computed shear stress with available experi-
                                         mental data [112]asreportedin[120]. The results are shown in
                                         Fig. 2.25, with a very good match between measured and com-
                                         puted values. All simulations were performed on a regular grid
                                         with size 0.1 mm, prescribing a time-dependent boundary condi-
                                         tion so that the maximum level of shear was reached at t = 0.5 s.
                                         Thetimestepwas setto δt = 10 −5  s.






















                                         Figure 2.25. Simple shear tests on a finite sample of myocardial tissue. Circles
                                         represent experimental data as provided by [112]. Plain curves represent
                                         computational results. Each label summarizes the test as follows: the first letter
                                         stands for the normal vector to the face that is subject to shear, the second letter
                                         denotes the direction of shear.

                                            Consistent with experimental observations and with the defi-
                                         nition of the model, the numerical simulations predict different
                                         stress-strain relationships in the three planes. The accuracy of the
                                         computed stress was excellent in a wide range of shear, while de-
                                         creasing for shear greater than 0.45. For high shear, in fact, the
                                         material tends to deform especially close to the loaded bound-
                                         aries, and this causes the deformation gradient to change. Com-
                                         pression and traction components become more significant and
                                         the test is no longer a simple shear test. In these conditions, it
                                         would be important to verify that the assumptions of the model
                                         hold to replicate the experimental results (in particular regarding
                                         how the boundary conditions are prescribed in the experimental
                                         setup). For all experiments, the parameters reported in Table 1.1
                                         were employed.

                                         Numerical stability analysis
                                            To verify the implementation of the TLED solver, a benchmark
                                         problem of linear elasticity was investigated, for which an analyt-
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111