Page 107 - Artificial Intelligence for Computational Modeling of the Heart
P. 107

Chapter 2 Implementation of a patient-specific cardiac model 77










                     Figure 2.26. A linear elastic beam of length l and height h is subject to a suddenly
                     applied shear stress S at one end while the other end is fixed.




















                     Figure 2.27. Displacement of the point at the center of the loaded boundary face,
                     computed with different spatial resolutions and with the analytical solution of the
                     problem.


                     ical solution was available. A beam of length l = 20 m and height
                     h = 5 m was fully constrained at one end and subject to a sud-
                     denly applied constant shear stress S = 1 MPa at the other end
                     (Fig. 2.26). All the other faces were traction free. A Young mod-
                     ulus of E = 4 MPa was used, with Poisson ratio of 0.32 and a
                                                    3
                     structure density ρ s = 1450 kg/m . The material reacted to the
                     sudden shear load with a series of non damped sinusoidal oscil-
                     lations about an equilibrium end displacement. The frequency ω
                     and amplitude δ of the oscillations can be predicted by means
                     of reduced models (1D beam theory) [228]: δ = 0.305 mand ω =
                     3.35 Hz.
                        The model was able to correctly describe the motion of the
                     beam for a range of spatial discretizations (element sizes: 1.25 m,
                     0.625 m and 0.3125 m). The non damped oscillation of the beam
                     was computed for 1 s, with time step δt = 5 × 10 −5  s. The displace-
                     ment of the point at the center of the boundary face subjected to
                     the shear stress was observed and compared with the analytical
                     solution. Fig. 2.27 shows that the numerical solution on the coars-
                     est mesh suffered from significant numerical dissipation. On the
                     two finer meshes, the solution was however in very good agree-
                     ment with the analytical solution: the equilibrium displacement
   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112