Page 504 - Automotive Engineering Powertrain Chassis System and Vehicle Body
P. 504

CHAP TER 1 5. 1       Modelling and assembly of the full vehicle





















































               Fig. 15.1-45 Driver and vehicle behaviour for a post-limit turn-in event (photograph courtesy of Don Palmer, www.donpalmer.co.uk).

               compared here to a real vehicle. Note the freewheeling  control beyond these body slip angles is unlikely without
               analytical model (of a significantly different vehicle)  very large amounts of space indeed.
               displays greater body slip angle, while the real vehicle  Most drivers are acutely sensitive to the rate of change
               displays greater oversteer.                        of body slip angle, albeit they do not always respond
                                                                  correctly to it. Instead a ‘threshold’ behaviour appears
               15.1.13.3 Body slip angle control                  common, with drivers neglecting body slip angle until
                                                                  either the angle becomes large or its rate of change be-
               Skilled drivers, particularly rally drivers, frequently  comes large. For road cars, our goals are to have a road car
               operate at large body slip angles. Colloquially, there is  manage its own body slip angle so as not to put pressure on
               much talk of body slip angles being in excess of 45  drivers in an area where in general skill is lacking. For
               degrees but recorded data suggests this is not the case  driver modelling purposes, a separate body slip angle
               despite appearances. Large body slip angles generally  control loop is desirable to catch spins but need not be
               slow progress; although some of the yaw transients are  terribly sophisticated since if it is invoked then we have to
               rapid, in general the actual body slip angles are compar-  some extent failed. Such behaviour is desirable in the real
               atively small (Fig. 15.1-46). In general, drivers greatly  vehicle too and is the goal of active intervention systems
               overestimate body slip angle subjectively (Fig. 15.1-47).  such as brake-based stability control systems; however,
                 The steering system on a vehicle has only 20–25  the robust sensing of body slip angle still proves elusive in
               degrees (less on the rally car) of lock and so realistically,  a cost-effective manner despite its apparent simplicity.


                    512
   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509