Page 601 - Automotive Engineering Powertrain Chassis System and Vehicle Body
P. 601

CHAP TER 1 8. 1       Design and material utilization

               to four times the static wheel load. Predicted life based  are considered, before moving to the spaceframe concept
               on specimen test data could be twice that obtained from  and finally the inevitable hybrid configurations. In this
               service load data. Calculation of the damage contribution  context hybrid means mixed material content and
               of the individual events counted in the rainflow analysis  introduces the ‘user friendly’ advantages of polymers
               can be compared with conventional cyclic fatigue data to  (low impact resistance and styling freedom) combined
               obtain the necessary factoring. In cases where complete  with the lightweight advantage of aluminium plus the
               load reversal does not take place and the load alternates  practicality and safety connotations associated with steel.
               between two stress values, a different (lower) limiting  The latter has always been a strong argument of the
                                                                          ´
               stress is valid. The largest stress amplitude which alter-  anti-CAFE lobby in the USA who contend that the
               nates about a given mean stress, which can be withstood  benefits in fuel economy accompanying hybrid lighter-
               ‘infinitely’, is called the fatigue limit. The greatest en-  weight bodies are achieved at the expense of vehicle
               durable stress amplitude can be determined from a fa-  safety and claim to have accident statistics to prove this.
               tigue limit diagram, (e), for any minimum or mean stress.
               Stress range R is the algebraic difference between the
               maximum and minimum values of the stress. Mean stress  18.1.7.1 The unitary aluminium body
               M is defined such that limiting stresses are Mþ= R=2.
                 Fatigue limit in reverse bending is generally about 25%  The development of the all aluminium body is now more
               lower than in reversed tension and compression, due, it is  associated with the A8 and A2 spaceframe type of vehicle
               said, to the stress gradient – and in reverse torsion it is  (described later) which constitutes a different type of
               about 0.55 times the tensile fatigue limit. Frequency of  concept, and the need for a fundamentally different type
               stress reversal also influences fatigue limit – becoming  of design may become more obvious if the production of
               higher with increased frequency. An empirical formula  an aluminium body is considered with conventional pro-
               due to Gerber can be used in the case of steels to estimate  duction technology. Although some use was made of
               the maximum stress during each cycle at the fatigue limit  aluminium prior to 1900 for the Durkopp developed
                                                                          8
               as R/2 þ (s u 2– nRs u ) 1/2  where s u is the ultimate tensile  sports car and later reference was made to the Pierce
               stress and n is a material constant ¼ 1.5 for mild and 2.0  Arrow body (1909) which incorporated rear end panel,
               for high tensile steel. This formula can be used to show  roof, firewall and doors in cast aluminium, the Dyna
               the maximum cyclic stress s for mild steel increasing  Panhard was probably the first aluminium bodied car to be
               from one-third ultimate stress under reversed loading to  mass produced in Europe in any numbers. The Honda
               0.61 for repeated loading. A rearrangement and simpli-  NSX sports car represents the most recent conventional
               fication of the formula by Goodman results in the linear  body built within the context of modern manufacturing
               relation R ¼ (s u /n)[1– M/s u ] where M ¼ s – R/2. The  and proves that although some equipment modifications
               view in (e) also shows the relative curves in either  were necessary assembly was possible in moderate
               a Goodman or Gerber diagram frequently used in fatigue  numbers.
               analysis. If values of R and s u are found by fatigue tests
               then the fatigue limits under other conditions can be  18.1.7.1.1 The Honda NSX
               found from these diagrams.                         Following a consideration of specific strength, specific
                 Where a structural element is loaded for a series of  rigidity and equivalent rigidity compared with sheet steel
                                                                          9
               cycles n1, n2. at different stress levels, with corre-  and SMC the decision was made to manufacture the
               sponding fatigue life at each level N1, N2. cycles,  BIW in aluminium to reduce the weight by about 140 kg.
                                        P
               failure can be expected at  n/N ¼ 1 according to   The rigidity of a car such as the NSX is critical to
               Miner’s law. Experiments have shown this factor to vary  maintain steering stability, and to help improve this the
               from 0.6 to 1.5 with higher values obtained for sequences  sills were produced as extrusions with variable side wall
               of increasing loads.                               thickness. The comparison is shown in Fig. 18.1-22.
                                                                    To satisfy different requirements for strength, form-
                                                                  ability, weldability and coating, detailed preparatory
               18.1.7 Alternative body architecture               background studies showed that different alloys should
                                                                  be used for different panel applications and these are
               Before examples of more adventurous modern designs  indicated in Fig. 18.1-23.
               are presented, certain vehicles are now highlighted which  It was found that wrinkling and shape control were the
               illustrate further interesting steps in body and materials  main problems on forming, attributed to lower modulus
               development. Having commenced with essentially steel  which resulted in more springback (compared to steel)
               bodies of unitary design, and it must be remembered that  and also the lower ‘r’ value. Twice the overcrowning
               these still constitute the vast majority of volume cars  allowance was required than for steel in the forming of
               produced, ‘conventionally built’ aluminium structures  door outer panels. Together with proportionally lower


                    612
   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605   606