Page 600 - Automotive Engineering Powertrain Chassis System and Vehicle Body
P. 600

Design and material utilization   C HAPTER 18.1


              Stress range
                         Stress amplitude
                                          Strain amplitude
                          Mean stress       10  –2
              Max’m/Min’m stress             –3

              (a)                           10
                                                             Reversale to failure (2NF)
                                            10  –4
                                              10 0   10 1   10 2   10 3    10 4   10 5    10 6   10 7  (c) 10 8
              Max’m stress  Ferrous         1000.

                             Non-ferrous
                                             800.
                     10 6   10 8
              (b)    No. of cycles           600.
                                           Total stress (MPa)


                R o  = σ u /n                400.
                            Gerber’s law
             R
                                                                                              Menetenic
                                             200.
                 Goodman’s                                                                    Cyclic
                   law
                                                                    Total strain
                                               0.
              (e)      M          σ u          0.0000     .0040      .0080       .0120      .0160       .0200
                                                                                                          (d)
           Fig. 18.1-21 Fatigue life evaluation: (a) terminology for cyclic stress; (b) S–N diagram; (c) strain/life curves; (d) dynamic stress/strain
           curves; (e) fatigue limit diagrams.


           obstacle, the case of the single wheel bump, which causes  define an endurance range of limiting stress on a 10
           twist of the structure, must be considered. The torque  million life cycle basis. A log–log scale is used to show the
           applied to the structure is assumed to be 1.5   the static  exponential relationship S ¼ C. Nx which usually exists,
           wheel load   half the track of the axle. Depending on the  for C and x as constants, depending on the material and
           height of the bump, the individual static wheel load may  type of test, respectively. The graph shows a change in
           itself vary up to the value of the total axle load.  slope to zero at a given stress for ferrous materials –
             As well as shock or impact loading, repetitive cyclic  describing an absolute limit for an indefinitely large
           loading has to be considered in relation to the effective  number of cycles. No such limit exists for non-ferrous
           life of a structure. Fatigue failures, in contrast to those  metals and typically, for aluminium alloy, a ‘fatigue limit’
                                                                       8
           due to steady load, can of course occur at stresses much  of 5   10 is defined. It has also become practice to
           lower than the elastic limit of the structural materials,  obtain strain/life (c) and dynamic stress/strain (d) for
           Fig. 18.1-21. Failure normally commences at a disconti-  materials under sinusoidal stroking in test machines.
           nuity or surface imperfection such as a crack which  Total strain is derived from a combination of plastic
           propagates under cyclic loading until it spreads across the  and elastic strains and in design it is usual to use
           section and leads to rupture. Even with ductile materials  a stress/strain product from these curves rather than a
           failure occurs without generally revealing plastic  handbook modulus figure. Stress concentration factors
           deformation. The view at (a) shows the terminology for  must also be used in design.
           describing stress level and the loading may be either  When designing with load histories collected from
           complete cyclic reversal or fluctuation around a mean  instrumented past vehicle designs of comparable speci-
           constant value. Fatigue life is defined as the number of  fication, signal analysis using rainflow counting tech-
           cycles of stress the structure suffers up until failure. The  niques is employed to identify number of occurrences in
           plot of number of cycles is referred to as an S–N diagram,  each load range. In service testing of axle beam loads it
           (b), and is available for different materials based on  has been shown that cyclic loading has also occasional
           laboratory controlled endurance testing. Often they  peaks, due to combined braking and kerbing, equivalent


                                                                                                      611
   595   596   597   598   599   600   601   602   603   604   605