Page 354 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 354

338                            S. POMMIER

             sufficient  to let  a load percolation  network  appear.  The  second reason  is that  micro-crack
             nucleation occurs mostly at the surfaces of the samples. However, in a massive sample, grains
             located under the surface, may contribute to homogenize the stress state within the polycrystal.
             It was shown before [ 151, with a rough model of a massive sample, that the scatter is lower in
             the bulk than at the surfaces. Nevertheless, the scatter at the surfaces is very similar in the case
             of a thin sheet and in the case of a grain located at the surface of a massive sample. This point
             would  need  further  investigation,  since  the  difference  between  the  stress  and  strain
             heterogeneity at the surfaces and in the bulk of a sample could contribute, with environmental
             effects, to explain the preferential nucleation of micro-cracks at the surfaces.


             CONCLUSIONS


               Probabilistic approaches are developed to describe scale effects and scatter in fatigue. When
             fatigue cracks are nucleated on defects, the origin of the scatter is clear. When defects are non-
             damaging, micro-cracks are usually nucleated by cyclic slip in “weak” grains. In this case, the
             origins of the scatter in fatigue lives remain unclear.
               Under bulk elastic conditions, a “weak” grain is a grain within which the maximum resolved
             shear  stress  on  the  slip  systems  is  the  highest,  which  happens  when  two  conditions  are
             satisfied: the Schmid factor of the grain is high and the stress applied on the “weak”  grain is
             high. The object of the paper was to discuss the second condition. Since the elastic behaviour
             of the grains is anisotropic, the stress and strain distribution is heterogeneous in a polycrystal.
             The spatial distribution of this heterogeneity was studied using experiments and finite element
             analyses.
               The spatial distribution of strain at the  surface of  a sample of TA6V titanium alloy was
             observed using the photostress method. Though the material is fully elastic, fine inclined lines
             appeared at the  surface of  the sample, where the strain is higher than  the mean one in  the
             sample. However the direction of the principal strain remains mostly coincident with the load
             axis. This experiment showed that there is a scale associated with the strain heterogeneity in
             the TA6V titanium alloy, which is larger than the grain size, approaching 10 grains.
               In order to reveal a scale for the spatial distribution of strain in a different material, thin
             sheet of OFHC polycrystalline copper have been subjected to a cyclic creep test. After failure,
             fine inclined lines forming a regular pattern are observed at the surface of the sample, revealing
             a scale for the heterogeneity of strain larger than one millimetre.
               Finite elements calculations were performed, in order to understand the above-mentioned
             effects.
               A  polycrystalline thin sheet was modelled by FEM analysis. These computations showed
             that a load percolation network, analogous to that observed in a granular material, is formed
             through the polycrystal. The load is transferred through heavily loaded links whose direction is
             coincident with the principal stress directions of the equivalent homogeneous problem. This
             network possesses an intrinsic scale larger than the grain size.
               The  probability  of  a  given  value  of  the  maximum  principal  stress  within  a  grain  was
             calculated using the FEM. One grain located at the centre of the thin sheet was set to have a
             fixed  orientation,  while  the  crystalline  orientations  of the  other  grains  in  the  model  were
             selected randomly before  each calculation. The variability of the  maximum principal  stress
             under uniaxial loading conditions depends on the elastic anisotropy of the grain. For a given
             crystal orientation, the maximum principal stress vary up to +I-  35 % for zinc and copper and
   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359