Page 54 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 54

Evaluation of Fatigue of Fillet  Welded Joints in  Vehicle Components Under Multiaxial Service Loads  39

            Validation of calculated fatigue results

            Calculated fatigue lives or damage sums are influenced by several factors which are worth to
            be discussed in the following:
              As mentioned previously, the local stress approach is applied in practice in connection with
            the  submodelling technique. Within the latter, the usual procedure is to take displacements
            (and rotations) from a coarse mesh as boundary conditions for the finely meshed submodel.
            Attention should be paid to the requirement that the stiffnesses of the models do not differ too
            much.  For  example,  a  very  stiff  submodel will  yield  much  higher  stresses under  applied
            displacements  than  a  compliant  submodel  would.  In  the  current  investigation  we  found
            differences in  resulting bending  and torsion  moments in  the tube in  the order of  5%.  The
            higher stresses occurred for the  stiffer new design variant. This is the reason for the lower
            predicted  lives  for  this  design.  Some inherent uncertainties are obviously linked  with  the
            submodelling'technique itself.
              Calculated  results  also  depend  on  the  multiaxial  fatigue  criterion  used.  In  general
            nonproportional loading cases, criteria based on conventional equivalent stresses (Tresca, von
            Mises) are inappropriate. In special cases with locally proportional stress situation, they might
            work to a limited extent as well. The hypothesis of the effective equivalent stress introduced
            by  Sonsino  and  Kuppers  [21] showed good predictions for welded flange-tube joints  from
            fine-grained steel FeE 460 under bending and torsion with constant and variable amplitudes.
              As mentioned above, these cases - dominating uniaxial stresses for example - have some
            practical relevance. In  case of  doubts on  local  stress states, critical plane criteria should be
            preferred: Critical plane - normal stress (mode I) or critical plane - shear stress (mode II+m).
            The  first  one  should  normally  be  used  when  normal  stresses  are  dominant.  The  second
            criterion is appropriate in the case of dominating shear stresses.
              Scatter of  fatigue lives is an unavoidable matter of  fact. It  should be taken into account
            when  comparing  calculated  and  experimentally  determined  lives.  The  number  of  tested
            components here is quite low; thus, even mean values of lives are subject to uncertainties. On
            the other hand, the baseline stress-life curves for prediction, Figs. 7 and  15, are only mean
            curves  in  a  scatter band. Within  the  local stress approach, the ratio  T for probabilities of
            survival of  10% to 90% (in stresses) is  1.5 for normal stresses and  1.39 for shear stresses,
            respectively [ 19,201. Thus, a factor of 2 to 3 in lives can easily arise from this fact and can be
            qualified as minor inaccuracies.
              At last, the real fatigue life mainly depends on the geometrical form and quality of a single
            weld. It is possible to model the real welded form or geometry from a drawing. In this report
            the geometry of  already existing welds is modelled. However, the plane surface of  the weld
            and the notch radius  lmm are idealisations. But geometry and stress distribution depend on
            each  other. Therefore,  the  element with  maximum damage sum is  not  the  only one to  be
            looked at. Other elements with similar damage sums should also be regarded as failure-critical
            as well.
              These failure-critical locations can be determined quite accurately using the local stress
            approach. Using the hot spot stress approach, only one critical location on the tube has been
            detected. This location  is verified and one more location has been  detected with  the local
            stress approach. The corresponding finite element results for the older geometry verified the
            weld  root  as failure-critical.  This  is  in  good  agreement to the  experimental results.  After
            modification of the tube to the new geometry the weld root is no longer failure-critical.
              Figure 23 shows a tested component with new  geometry. A further effect is shown: The
            crack initiation does not start from the weld at all. The notch at the tapering of  the tube far
            away from the weld undercut is failure-critical. Finally, this result prevented the presentation
            of experimental fatigue lives for the new design (for the weld undercut). On the one hand, it is
            possible to  calculate lives for this location based  on  local  stresses or  strains and  on  cyclic
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59