Page 124 - Big Data Analytics for Intelligent Healthcare Management
P. 124

5.8 RESULTS, INTERPRETATION AND DISCUSSION            117






                Table 5.7 Individual Trend Lines
                     Panes      Color         Line                    Coefficients
                Row     Column  Techniques P-Value  DF Term     Value   StdErr  t-Value  P-Value
                Duration BaseLine  GSRa   .226577  24  ln (Avg.  2.7703  2.2322  1.24106  .226577
                                                      Frequency)
                                                      intercept  7.96937  3.70551  2.15068  .0417848
                Duration BaseLine  EMGa   .650741  25  ln (Avg.  1.53178  3.34276  0.458237  .650741
                                                      Frequency)
                                                      intercept  12.1876  6.46665  1.88469  .0711494
                Duration 1month  GSRa     .123465  22  ln(Avg.  4.6758  2.91912  1.60179  .123465
                                                      Frequency)
                                                      intercept  1.55971  4.93291  0.316186  .754842
                Duration 1month  EMGa     .331464  25  ln(Avg.  2.64055  2.66612  0.99041  .331464
                                                      Frequency)
                                                      intercept  7.0711  4.69983  1.50454  .144971
                Duration 3months  GSRa    .0421601 22  ln(Avg.  3.05883  1.41782  2.15741  .0421601
                                                      Frequency)
                                                      intercept  1.83738  1.88265  0.975956  .339696
                Duration 3months  EMGa    .0463431 21  ln(Avg.   4.12013 1.94597   2.11726  .0463431
                                                      Frequency)
                                                      intercept  15.6719  3.34793  4.68107  .0001277
                Duration 6months  GSRa    .717234  20  ln(Avg.   0.42236 1.14982   0.367326 .717234
                                                      Frequency)
                                                      intercept  5.80349  1.64583  3.52617  .0021225
                Duration 6months  EMGa    .120306  21  ln(Avg.   2.66436 1.64539   1.61929  .120306
                                                      Frequency)
                                                      intercept  9.37492  2.27736  4.11656  .0004917
                Duration 12months GSRa    .397623  17  ln(Avg.  0.680635  0.78438  0.867736  .397623
                                                      Frequency)
                                                      intercept  2.98464  0.86419  3.45369  .0030338
                Duration 12months EMGa    .256275  17  ln(Avg.  1.08554  0.924033 1.17478  .256275
                                                      Frequency)
                                                      intercept  3.13099  1.14255  2.74034  .0139474





                  From 3 to 6months, there was a very steep rate of reduction of TTH frequency of subjects causing a
               sudden fall in frequency of TTH in subjects from 6.24 to 4.604/week, reflecting high improvement
               from the subjects.
                  The average reduction in frequency was observed as 4.121/week, which is almost double that of
               GSRv (1.72). Total dropouts in the experiment was 8.
                  Hence, we can conclude that the average overall reduction of EMGv was far better than that of
               GSRv resulting in better motivation, trust, and interest toward the EMGv technique/therapy and slight
               fewer subject dropouts.
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129