Page 115 - Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future
P. 115

102   Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future


          tonnes per crop). In the cases where there are other products besides elec-
          tricity, there are higher avoided emissions. This demonstrates that the envi-
          ronmental benefits associated with diversification of production in the sugar
          and ethanol industry reflect on the environmental benefits resultant of the
          application of the obtained products. The production of biofuels and other
          chemical products is more attractive, from the viewpoint of avoided emis-
          sions, than the production of electricity. This occurs because the Brazilian
          energy matrix is mainly based on renewable resources.
             Comparison of the B2G case with the E2G, FT, and BSE cases highlights
          much lower avoided emissions than the other processes, because the B2G
          case presents low productivity. Due to this reason, less products substitute
          a less fossil fuel-based products, avoiding less emissions.
             The FT case, which contemplates the thermochemical route, presented
          slightly higher performance in comparison with the remaining cases, as more
          products are obtained yielding a higher substitution of fossil fuels.



          18 Comparative analysis

          A radar diagram can help compare the results of the study cases, where the
          indicators are normalized in relation with the highest value. Table 4.9 pre-
          sents data on the indicators, along with the normalized products. Normal-
          ization presented in Table 4.10 consists of calculating the ratio of the
          difference between the indicator value and the lowest value of this indicator,
          and the difference between the highest and lowest indicator values. The
          radar diagram is shown in Fig. 4.18.


          Table 4.10 Absolute and normalized indicator values
                            Indicator values               Normalized
                                    Avoided
                                              6
                           σ (GJ/   emissions 10 kg                Avoided
                  η global
          Case    (%)      ha)      de CO 2eq .      η global  σ   emissions
          E2G     55.84%   258.53   460.54           0.32    1.00  0.78
          B2G     52.01%   240.82   286.30           0.00    0.34  0.22
          BGT     61.19%   234.25   255.20           0.77    0.09  0.12
          FT      63.85%   244.47   530.73           1.00    0.47  1.00
          BSE     56.65%   247.14   367.30           0.39    0.57  0.48
          ZRO     60.56%   231.84   218.56           0.72    0.00  0.00
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120