Page 322 - Biomedical Engineering and Design Handbook Volume 2, Applications
P. 322

300  DIAGNOSTIC EQUIPMENT DESIGN

                         Solving for the M [s] by successively subtracting series for M [ks]/k, with k chosen to eliminate
                                      n                               n
                       progressively higher terms in M [ks], gives the expression
                                              n
                                    π ⎡      1        1        1          1 1      ⎤
                              M [] =   M() +   M( σ ) −  M( σ ) +  M( σ ) +  B  Mk ( σ ...  (10.109)
                                 σ
                                         σ
                                                                                )
                                                                   7
                                                          5
                                                 3
                               n      ⎢    r        r       r        r   k      r  ⎥
                                     4 ⎣     3        5        7          k        ⎦
                       where k takes on the odd values 1, 3, 5, etc., and B is 1, 0, or −1 according to
                                                           k
                                                      m   k −1
                                                       −
                                                    1
                                               B =−() ()         if r =  m
                                                        1
                                                k
                                                           2
                                               B = 0             if  r <  m
                                                k
                       Here, m is the total number of primes into which k can be factored and r is the number of different prime
                       factors in k. According to Eq. (10.109) the modulation transfer function can be evaluated in terms of the
                       measured modulation, or contrast values M(s) . However, since a value of M(0) = 1 from Eq. (10.108)
                                                       r                      r
                       gives a corresponding value M [s] = 0.9538 from Eq. (10.109), we must apply a normalizing factor of
                                            n
                       1.0484 to the calculated result. We note that the values of M are compounded according to the product
                                                                n
                       of the individual MTFs of the imaging components. For the simple x-ray source and detector combina-
                                                s
                                        D
                                                                       D
                                      s
                       tion, we have M = M M , where M is the x-ray source MTF and M is the detector MTF. If the detec-
                                  n   n  n      n                     n
                       tor is a film emulsion, the MTF for the digital scanning device should be included in the product.
                         It is difficult to construct a suitable resolution standard of the Sayce type for x-ray imaging.
                       Typically the lines would be etched in a gold layer to provide good absorption, but as the line space
                       decreases the lithography process would require the layer to become progressively thinner to main-
                       tain the line discrimination. A limited alternative can be constructed from electron microscopy stan-
                       dard 8-mm-thick gold square grid structures. If two of these are superposed and skewed ~8°, the
                       tapered grid intersections will create a continuously varying spatial frequency. A suitable scale is
                       provided by a standard electron microscopy grid of spatial period of d = 24 mm with a 6-mm bar and
                       18-mm gap. To stabilize the structure, the grid assembly is sandwiched between standard 8-mm-thick
                       gold disks with suitably sized apertures. This arrangement provides useful contrast values for vary-
                       ing spatial frequency s but it is not a simple one-dimensional function as discussed in the foregoing
                       analysis. Also, the x-ray source is not a line source with a line-spread function as assumed. Hence,
                       the calculated values of the MTF will have a limited accuracy.
                         The values of M(s) and M [s] for the microfocal x-ray source are determined from a radiographic
                                       r    n
                       film image of the fabricated resolution standard at ×240 magnification (Fig. 10.35). Here, the










             FIGURE 10.35  X-ray source measured resolution.
   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327