Page 371 - Biomedical Engineering and Design Handbook Volume 2, Applications
P. 371

CHAPTER 12

                          BREAST IMAGING SYSTEMS:

                          DESIGN CHALLENGES
                          FOR ENGINEERS




                          Mark B. Williams
                          University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia

                          Laurie L. Fajardo
                          University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa







                          12.1 INTRODUCTION  349              12.4 NEW AND DEVELOPING BREAST
                          12.2 BREAST ANATOMY  350             IMAGING MODALITIES  356
                          12.3 CURRENT CLINICAL BREAST        12.5 FUTURE DIRECTIONS  366
                          IMAGING  350                        REFERENCES  367






              12.1 INTRODUCTION

                          Breast cancer is the second greatest cause (after lung cancer) of cancer-related death among
                          American women, accounting for approximately 40,000 deaths each year. At the present time, early
                          detection and characterization of breast cancers is our most effective weapon, since local disease is
                          in most cases curable. Breast imaging systems can thus be potentially useful if they either are
                          (1) useful for detection of cancers or (2) useful for characterization of suspicious lesions that may or
                          may not be cancerous. Similarly, from a clinical perspective, methodologies used for breast cancer
                          diagnosis (as opposed to therapy) fall into one of two broad categories: screening or diagnostic.
                          Screening pertains to the population of women exhibiting no symptoms. Diagnostic imaging (other-
                          wise known as problem-solving imaging) is used when there is some suspicion of disease, as a result
                          of the manifestation of some physical symptom, of a physical exam, or of a screening study. The rel-
                          ative effectiveness of a given imaging modality at the tasks of detection and characterization deter-
                          mines whether it will be employed primarily in a screening or diagnostic context. At the present time,
                          x-ray mammography is the only FDA-approved modality for screening, and is by far the most effec-
                          tive modality because of its ability to detect small cancers when they are most treatable (i.e., prior to
                          metastasis). The sensitivity (fraction of all cancers that are detected) by screen-film mammography
                          is approximately 85 percent. Ultrasound, MRI, breast specific gamma imaging, positron emission
                          mammography, and electrical impedance scanning are FDA approved as diagnostic procedures fol-
                          lowing detection of an abnormality via x-ray mammography.
                            When designing a system for either screening or diagnostic imaging of the breast, several char-
                          acteristics of the breast itself present unique engineering challenges. First, unlike parts of the body
                          supported by bone, the breast is a malleable organ. Thus obtaining the exact same configuration for



                                                                                               349
   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376