Page 293 - Biosystems Engineering
P. 293

270    Cha pte r  Ei g h t

                   3.  Diesel fuel substitution up to 50 percent by the mass of etha-
                      nol is possible.
                   4.  Ethanol fumigation system is separate from the diesel fuel
                      injection system, and the engine can be quickly converted
                      back to diesel operation.
                   Chaplin and Janius  studied the effect on engine performance by
                                   30
               ethanol fumigation. A Ford 801, four-cylinder direct-injection diesel
               tractor engine was used for the study. Fumigation of ethanol was accom-
               plished by using a cone jet nozzle mounted in an inlet manifold
               extension pipe. Tests were conducted at 18, 23, and 30° angle bTDC.
               Ethanol mass flow rates were set at 0, 25, 32, and 45 g/min, respectively.
               The mass flow rate of ethanol was not modulated with the engine speed.
                        31
               Cruz et al.  tested a turbocharged 650-kW diesel tractor engine with
               the spray addition method. For this approach, a mixture of water and
               ethanol was sprayed into the airstream by means of pressure from the
               turbocharged. Goering et al.  installed a multipoint fumigation sys-
                                       32
               tem on a Case IH 52882 six-cylinder turbocharged 128-kW diesel farm
               tractor engine. Holes were drilled in the cylinder head to permit the
               installation of six Bosch model electronic fuel injection nozzles to
               spray fumigated ethanol on the tops of the intake valve. Denatured
               anhydrous ethanol was fumigated at a rate of 12 kg/h. Hayes et al. 33
               investigated the effect of fumigation of different ethanol proofs on a
               turbocharged diesel engine. Ethanol was injected directly into the
               intake ports to ensure even distribution among the cylinders. It was
               found that the ethanol proof had no apparent effect on the thermal
               efficiency at any load.
                   The experiments have been carried out on the Perkins P4 diesel
               engine (Simpson Electric Co., Wisconsin) of four-stroke direct-injection
               four-cylinder vertical, in-line 91.4-mm diameter. Bore × 127-mm
               stroke, capacity 3500 cc, compression ratio 18.5:1, overhead valves,
               29° angle bTDC injection timing. The engine is coupled to a hydraulic
               dynamometer for load measurements. The fumigation nozzle was a
               Pilot spray gun–type 64M (Mumbai, India) used as a fumigation noz-
               zle in the experiment. It was connected to a manometer and a recip-
               rocating compressor. The nozzle is used to fumigate the ethanol into
               the intake manifold of the engine. A wide, vertical or horizontal, fan
               spray or a round concentrated spray is produced by turning the air
               cap. The air cap-locking nut must be screwed up to grip the air cap
               firmly and yet allow the operator to turn the air cap by hand. The
               fumigation rate is controlled by the regulator on the air transformer.
               The smoke meter of model ED 1949, type ST-00N (Nissan Motor Sales
               Co. Ltd., Nissalco, Japan) is used to measure the smoke density. The
               exhaust gases such as CO, NO , and gas temperature were analyzed
                                         x
               with a gas-analyzing instrument TMT-16-S (Technovation Analytical
               Instruments Pvt. Ltd., Veravan Beveren, Germany). The engine speed
   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298