Page 131 - Carbon Nanotube Fibres and Yarns
P. 131

Post-spinning treatments to carbon nanotube fibers    123


              two sheets of A4 paper before being mechanically densified into CNT ribbons
              by a spatula. Then, 30 wt.% epoxy solution was used to infiltrate the ribbon
              structure to improve its mechanical performance.
                 As shown in Fig. 6.13A, the as-spun CNT fibers had a uniform diame-
              ter of 13.5 ± 0.21 μm. Due to their low spinning rate, the alignment degree
              of the as-spun CNT fibers used in this study was expected to be lower than
              that of those spun at 20 m/min [31]. The many pores and spaces on the fiber
              surface (Fig. 6.13B) indicate a porous structure.
                 After the application of mechanical densification, the CNT fibers
              were turned into ribbons with a width of ~22 ± 1.1 μm and a thickness of
              ~0.65 ± 0.12 μm, as shown in Fig. 6.14A and B. Comparing to the as-spun
              CNT fibers, the CNT ribbons had a more packed structure with better
              CNT alignment along the fiber axis (Fig. 6.14C). After epoxy-infiltration,
              the CNT ribbons showed smoother surfaces as the epoxy filled up most
              pores and spaces (Fig. 6.14D–F). The epoxy coated ribbons had width and
              thickness of 23.5 ± 1.2 μm and 1 ± 0.2 μm, respectively.
                 Fig. 6.15A shows stress-strain curves of the as-spun CNT fibers, CNT
              ribbons, and epoxy-infiltrated CNT ribbons. As can be seen, a transition
              from  elastic  to  plastic  deformation  appeared  before  failure  in  all  curves.
              The curves are linear and typically present a sharp increase in slope at low
              strains (1%–2%) and a gradual decrease in slope at high strains, indicating
              that the samples had ductile behavior. Overall, the strength and modulus of
              the CNT samples increased significantly after each treatment was applied.
                 Fig.  6.15B compares the mechanical strength and modulus of the
              CNT fibers, CNT ribbons, and cross-linked CNT ribbons.  The as-
              spun  CNT  fibers  had tensile  strength, Young’s  modulus  and  elongation
              of 0.27 ± 0.01 GPa,  4.28 ± 0.38 GPa,  12%,  respectively  [26], which were
              within the range of the as-spun MWNT fibers reported in the literature





                                                                      Pores






                                       50µm    CNT fiber direction      2µm
               (A)                            (B)
              Fig. 6.13  SEM images of (A) the as-spun CNT fiber and (B) its surface morphology.
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136