Page 173 - Catalysts for Fine Chemical Synthesis Vol 1 - Robert & Poignant
P. 173

160            hydrolysis, oxidation and reduction

                         Table 11.6 Effect of catalyst ratio and additives on % ee.

                         Entry    Mol % Catalyst      Additive      % ee
                         1              1          None              88
                         2              5          None              93
                         3              10         None              93
                         4              10         H 2 O (5)         85
                         5              10         H 2 O (20)        50
                         6              10         CH 3 CN (20)      92
                         7              10         2-propanol (20)   91


                  The minimum amount of catalyst needed to obtain maximum selectivity was
               determined to be 5 mol%. Larger quantities had no effect. Consistent with other
               literature reports [17] , very small quantities of water (5 mol% ˆ 2.5 mg H 2 O=g 3)
               lowered the selectivities (Table 11.6, entry 4). Water sensitivity required thor-
               ough drying of the equipment, the starting materials and the solvents. In the
                                                                        Ê
               case of tetrahydrofuran, drying was achieved by using activated 5 A molecular
               sieves (KF titration >0.005 %). On the other hand, solvents used for crystal-
               lization of the starting material (3), such as 2-propanol and acetonitrile showed
               little effect on the enantioselectivities of the reaction (entries 6 and 7).
                  After finding the optimal condition for catalyst 2a in the reduction process,
               studies were aimed at understanding the role of the rigid indane platform, which
               behaves as a conformationally restricted phenyl glycinol equivalent. The use of
               the homologous six-membered [18]  catalyst 5 in the asymmetric reduction process
               was examined. Surprisingly, the less rigid B±H catalyst 5a displayed a higher
               degree of enantioselection than the corresponding indane catalyst 2a (Table
               11.6), while B±Me catalyst 5b displayed similar selectivity compared to B±Me
               catalyst 2b. The increased selectivity of catalyst 5a may be due to the closer
               proximity of the C ortho ÿH to the N±BH 3 moiety when compared to catalyst 2a.
                  This study has clearly shown that B±H and B±Me catalysts have different
               optimal conditions for each catalyst system in the reduction of prochiral

               Table 11.7  Comparison of rigid aminoalcohols and catalyst types (B-methyl vs. B±H).

                                      R
                                 HN  B               H   R
                                      O              N  B                 H
                                                                          N
                                                       O
                                                                           B R
                                                                          O
                Catalyst b  (R)-5a, 96 % ee,  (R)-2a, 93 % ee,      (R)-6a, 26 % ee,
                R = H       0 8C, BH 3 •THF   0 8C, BH 3 •THF       25 8C, BMS*
                Catalyst a  (R)-5b, 95 % ee   (R)-2b, 96 % ee,      (R)-6b, 12 % ee,
                R = Me [20]  −10 8C, BMS      0 8C, BH 3 •THF       −10 8C, BH 3 •THF*

               *Unoptimized
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178