Page 353 - Chemical process engineering design and economics
P. 353

332                                                      Chapter 6

           of  the  fractionator.  To  determine  the  height  of  a  fractionator,  the  first  step  is  to
           identify  and  specify  the  recoveries  of  the heavy  and  light  key  components.  The
           light  key  component  will be  recovered  to  a  significant  extent  in  the  top product,
           whereas the heavy key  component will be recovered to a  significant  extent  in the
           bottom product.  After  specifying  recoveries of the key components, the next step
           is to calculate  the recoveries  of all other components.  The  component recoveries
           are  estimated  using  the  Geddes  equation  [34],  Equation  6.27.1  in  Table  6.27.
           Yaws  et  al.  [35]  compared  the  percent  recovery  of  each  component,  calculated
           from  Equation 6.27.1, with the percent recovery calculated using an exact method
           and  found that the maximum percent deviation was only  0.23%  for any one  com-
           ponent.
                For the equations listed in Table  6.27,  it is assumed that the relative volatil-
           ity is constant, but short cut methods are frequently  used when the relative volatil-
           ity varies.  In this case, an average relative volatility is used. King  [30]  shows that
           the  most  appropriate  average  is  the  geometric  average,  defined  by  Equations
           6.27.19. The  equations listed  in Table  6.27  are restricted to solutions that contain
           similar compounds, such as alaphatic or aromatic hydrocarbons.
                In the short cut method, the number of equilibrium stages needed for a given
           separation are correlated in terms of the minimum number of stages and the mini-
           mum reflux ratio.  Fenske  [38]  derived an expression for the minimum number of
           actual stages, Equation 6.27.2, by a stage to stage analysis, assuming that the rela-
           tive volatility  is constant.  This  equation  is applicable  to multicomponent  as well
           as binary solutions, and is derived in a number of texts, such as by King  [30].
                Underwood  [39]  derived  Equations  6.27.3  and  6.27.4  for  estimating  the
           minimum reflux  ratio  for  a  specified  separation  of  two  key  components.  These
           equations  assume  constant  molar  overflow  and  relative  volatility.  Underwood
           showed that at minimum reflux the value of 0 in Equations 6.27.3 and 6.27.4 must
           lie between the relative  volatility  of  the heavy and light key  components.  If the
           key  components  are  not  adjacent,  there  will be  more  than  one  value  of  0.  This
           case is illustrated  in an example by Walas  [6].  Here, we will  assume that the key
           components  are  adjacent.  As  has been pointed  out by  Walas  [6],  the  minimum
           reflux  ratio calculated by the Underwood  equations could turn out to be negative,
           which means that the equations do not apply for the given separation.

           Table 6.27  Summary of Equations for Sizing Fractionators
           Subscripts: i = the i  component
                    F = feed — D = distillate — B = bottom product
                    LK = light key component — HK = heavy key component

           Component Distribution
           log (n;D /n ;B) = Ac + B c log (a  i) avg                 (6.27.1 A)
           n iF = n iD + n iB                                       (6.27. IB)




         Copyright © 2003 by Taylor & Francis Group LLC
   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358