Page 293 - Classification Parameter Estimation & State Estimation An Engg Approach Using MATLAB
P. 293

282                               STATE ESTIMATION IN PRACTICE

            only a few states, i.e. N   M, the a priori form might be favourable. But
            in other cases, the Kalman form is often preferred.

              Example 8.11   The linear-Gaussian MMSE form
              Application of the MMSE form to the same system and data as in
              Example 8.10 yields the results as shown in Figure 8.8 (using 32-bit
              floating point number representations). At first sight, there seems
              nothing wrong with these results. However, the sudden change of
              the smallest eigenvalue at i ¼ 2, from which point on it remains
              constant, is reason to become suspicious.



            8.3.2  Sequential processing of the measurements

            The conventional Kalman filter processes the measurement data in blocks.
            The data z n (i) of the sensors available at time i are collected in the
            measurement vector z(i), and processed as one unit. Another possibility
            is to process the individual measurements sequentially. A requirement is
            that the measurement noise is uncorrelated. C v must be a diagonal matrix.
            If not, the measurement vector must be decorrelated first using techniques
            as described in Appendix C.3.1 (Kaminski et al., 1971). In the following
                                                             2
            algorithm, the diagonal elements of C v are denoted by   . The row vector
                                                             n
                                                T     T        T
            h n stands for the n-th row of H.Thus, H ¼ [ h  ... h  ].
                                                      0        N 1

               x 10 –7  minimum eigenvalue of C(i|i)
              9                               15 measurements
                                              10
             8.5                               5
                                               0
              8                               –5
                                             –10
                                                0     50    100   150    200
             7.5
                                             0.04 estimation errors
              7                              0.02
                                               0
             6.5
                                            –0.02
              6                             –0.04
               0     50    100   150    200     0     50    100   150    200
                            i                                i
            Figure 8.8  Results of the Kalman filter implemented in the MMSE form
   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298