Page 234 - Communication and the Evolution of Society
P. 234

211                        Notes

         “A  Step  Forward  to  a  Theory  of  Linguistic  Performance,”  in  Y.  Bar-
         Hillel,  ed.,  Pragmatics  of  Natural  Languages  (Dordrecht,  1971),  pp.  84—
         93;  cf.  also  R.  C.  Stalnaker,  ‘Pragmatics,’  in  Davidson  and  Harman,
         Semantics  of  Natural  Language  (Dordrecht,  1972),  pp.  380-387.
           ro.  R.  M.  Hare,  The  Language  of  Morals  (Oxford,  1952);  G.  H.  von
         Wright,  Norm  and  Action  (London,  1963);  and  N.  Rescher,  Topzes  in
         Philosophical  Logic  (Dordrecht,  1968).
           11.  L.  Apostel,  “A  Proposal  on  the  Analysis  of  Questions,”  in  Logique
         et  Analyse,  12(1969):376-381;  and  W.  Kuhlmann,  Reflexion  zwischen
         Theorie  und  Kvitik  (Frankfurt,  1975).
           12.  S.  Toulmin,  The  Uses  of  Argument  (Cambridge,  1964);  W.  C.
         Salmon,  The  Foundation  of  Scientific  Inference  (Pittsburg,  1967);  and  cf.
         the  summary  chapter  on  ‘“‘non-demonstrative  inference”  in  R.  P.  Botha,
         The  Justification  of  Linguistic  Hypotheses  (The  Hague,  1973),  pp.  25-72.
           13,  F,  Kiefer,  “On  Presuppositions,”  in  F.  Kiefer  and  N.  Ruwet,  eds.,
         Generative  Grammar  in  Europe  (Dordrecht,  1973),  pp.  218-242;  K.  H.
         Ebert,  “Prasuppositionen  im  Sprechakt,”  in  Cate  and  Jordens,  eds.,  Lin-
         guistische  Perspektiven  (Tubingen,  1973),  pp.  45-Go;  and  F.  Petof,
         Prasup  positionen  in  Linguistik  und  Philosophie  (Frankfurt,  1974).
           14.  H.  P.  Grice,  “The  Logic  of  Conversation,’  unpubl.  MS  (1968);
         and  D.  Gordon  and  G.  Lakoff,  “Conversational  Postulates,”  unpubl.  MS
         (1973).
           15.  J.  R.  Ross,  “On  Declarative  Sentences,”  in  Jacob  Rosenbaum,  ed.,
         Readings  in  English  Transformational  Grammar  (Waltham,  Mass.,  1970),
         Pp.  222-277;  J.  D.  MacCawley,  “The  Role  of  Semantics  in  a  Grammar,”
         in  Bach  and  Harms,  Universals  of  Language  (New  York,  1968),
         pp.  125-170;  and  D.  Wunderlich,  “Sprechakte,”  in  Mass  and  Wunder-
         lich,  Pragmatik  und  sprachliches  Handeln  (Frankfurt,  1972),  pp.  69-
         188,  and  “Zur  Konventionalitét  von  Sprechhandlungen,”  in  D.  Wunder-
         lich,  ed.,  Linguistische  Pragmatik  (Frankfurt,  1972),  pp.  11-58.
           16.  C.  J.  Fillmore,  “Pragmatics  and  the  Description  of  Discourse,”
         unpubl.  MS  (1973);  G.  Posner,  Textgrammatik  (Frankfurt,  1973).
           17.  J.  Lyons,  Introduction  to  Theoretical  Linguistics  (New  York,
         1968);  J.  J.  Katz,  Semantic  Theory  (New  York,  1972).
           18.  P.  F.  Strawson,  Logico-Linguistic  Papers  (London,  1971).
           19.  A.  C.  Danto,  Analytical  Philosophy  of  Action  (Cambridge,  1973);
         S.  Hampshire,  Thought  and  Action  (London,  1960);  D.  S.  Schwayder,
         The  Stratification  of  Behavior  (London,  1965);  and  Care  and  Landesman,
         eds.,  Readings  in  the  Theory  of  Action  (London,  1968).
           20.  P.  Winch,  The  Idea  of  a  Social  Science  and  Its  Relation  to  Philoso-
         phy  (London,  1958);  C.  Taylor,  “Explaining  Action,”  Inquiry  13  (1973):
         54-89;  and  H.  von  Wright,  Explanation  and  Understanding  (London,
         1971),  and  “On  the  Logic  and  Epistemology  of  the  Causal  Relation,”
         in  P.  Suppes,  ed.,  Logic,  Methodology  and  Philosophy  of  Science,  vol.  4
         (1973),  Ppp.  239-312.
   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239