Page 42 - Computational Fluid Dynamics for Engineers
P. 42

1.4  Prediction  of  Aircraft  Performance  Degradation  Due to  Icing  27



         continuous  phases;  the  process  involves  convective  heat  transfer  which  is  again
         linked to the shape  of the body and the nature  of the  flow around  it. It  is evident,
         therefore,  that  a mathematical  description  of the  phenomenon  of  ice  formation
         and  its effects  on  lift  and drag requires the solution  of time-dependent  equations,
         albeit  with  comparatively  large  time  scales,  with  consideration  of  conservation
         of  mass,  momentum  and  thermal  energy  and  with  a  model  to  represent  the  ice
         accretion  process.  In  addition,  since  the  flow  is  turbulent  under  practically  all
         conditions,  the  solution  of  the  conservation  equations  discussed  in  Chapter  2
         requires  a closure  model  with  roughness  effects.  As discussed  in  Section  8.3,  our
         understanding  of turbulent  flows  on  surfaces  with  roughness  and  our  ability  to
         model  them  is  rather  limited,  even  for  geometries  less  complicated  than  those
         with  ice.  For  these  reasons,  prediction  of  ice  accretion  is  not  just  a  matter  of
         solving  the  known  conservation  equations,  as  discussed  in  [23].
            A  popular  and  useful  computer  code  for  computing  ice  accretion  on  single
         airfoils  is the LEWICE  code described  in  [24]. This code has three main  modules,
         as  shown  in  Fig.  1.27.  The  ice accretion  is computed  on  the  airfoil  leading  edge
         as  a  function  of time  with  user  specified  time  intervals.  At  each  given  time,  the
         flowfield  is determined  from  a panel  code  (similar to the one discussed  in  Section
         6.4)  so that  trajectory  and  heat  transfer  calculations  can  be  performed.  As  ice
         accretion  increases,  its shape  may  become  ragged,  especially  in the  case  of  glaze
         ice  which  is characterized  by  horns,  and  a  rough,  irregular  surface  may  develop
         which  leads to  higher  aerodynamic  losses,  unlike  rime  ice.  Surface  irregularities
         of the  ice shape can lead to multiple stagnation  points that  increase the  difficulty
         of  numerical  calculations,  including  a  breakdown  of the  trajectory  calculations.
            The  automated  smoothing  procedure  of  [25]  overcomes  this  difficulty  by
         reducing  the  amplitude  of  the  surface  irregularities  without  loss  of  important
         flow  characteristics;  this  smoothing  procedure  usually  allows  the  calculations
         to  be  performed  for  greater  time  intervals  than  before,  without  the  problems
         caused  by  multiple  stagnation  points.
            The  flowfield  needed  to  determine  the  water  droplet  trajectories  is  obtained
         from  a  panel  method  similar  to  the  one  discussed  in  Section  6.4.  The  ice  shape
         is determined  from  a  quasi-steady-state  surface  heat  transfer  analysis  in  which
         mass  and  energy  equations  are  solved.
            The  LEWICE   code  does  a  good  job  of  predicting  ice  shapes  on  airfoils,
         especially  those  corresponding  to  rime  ice  (Fig.  1.28a). This  is despite  the  very
         empirical  nature  of  the  expressions  used  in  the  heat  balance  as  well  as  the




            Flowfield            Droplet               Ice
           Calculation         Trajectories          Accretion

         Fig.  1.27.  Structure  of  LEWICE.
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47