Page 234 - Computational Retinal Image Analysis
P. 234

4  Lesion detection and segmentation  231




                  with shallow neural network for exudates (EX) classification. Grisan and Ruggeri
                  [32] presented a two-stage classifier for BL and RL detection. A Bayesian classifier
                  was used for pixel classification and followed by linear discriminative analysis that
                  performed lesion classification. Massey and Hunter [33] combined spatial clustering
                  of objects with multilayered neural networks and SVMs to detect BL and RL.

                  4.3  Region growing

                  Region growing methods examine neighborhoods of seed points and determine
                  whether they should be part of a specific region. Spencer et al. [34] proposed matched
                  filtering and bilinear top-hat transformation to find initial MAs. Subsequently, they
                  used a region growing algorithm to produce final segmentation results. Cree et al.
                  [35] extended [34] with more intensity-based  features and novel region growing
                  algorithm. Frame et al. [36] combined region growing approach with three different
                  classifiers: shallow neural network, linear discriminant analysis, and rule-based
                  system.  They concluded that manually created rule-based system provides best
                  results; however, their experimental dataset consisted of only 20 images. Fleming
                  et  al. [37] emphasized the importance of contrast normalization and proposed
                  a “Watershed Retinal Region Growing” algorithm to segment lesions. Li and
                  Chutatape [38] proposed a fusion of edge detection and region growing algorithm for
                  exudate detection. Sinthanayothin et al. [39] introduced the “moat operator” that was
                  used to sharpen lesions’ edges. They combined it with the recursive region growing
                  algorithm to segment both BL and RL.


                  4.4  Thresholding
                  Threshold-based methods exploit differences in color intensity between  various
                  image regions. Zhang et al. [40] proposed a method based on dynamic thresholding
                  and correlation coefficients of a multiscale Gaussian template to detect MAs. They
                  used 31 manually designed features based on intensity, shape, and response of a
                  Gaussian filter. Pereira et al. [41] combined a thresholding approach with the ant
                  colony optimizer to segment EXs. EX candidates were identified using a thresholding
                  method, whereas the unsupervised ant colony optimizer was used to enhance EXs’
                  edges. García et al. [42] suggested a combination of adaptive and global thresholding
                  approaches  to find EX  candidates. Next, a radial  basis function  classifier was
                  designed to classify lesions based on features mainly derived from lesions’ shape and
                  color. Saleh and Eswaran [43] developed a decision support system to find RLs. They
                  combined H-maxima transform for candidate selection with multilevel thresholding
                  to create final segmentation. Phillips et al. [44] used a combination of global, local,
                  and adaptive thresholding algorithms to find lesions. To tackle uneven illumination
                  of FPs, Sánchez et al. [45] combined dynamic thresholding based on mixture models
                  with edge detection.
   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239