Page 287 - Computational Retinal Image Analysis
P. 287

3  Oct fluid detection  285






















                  FIG. 5
                  Example of a fluid identification by performing an occlusion test on an image classification
                  model. Top row shows three examples (A, B, C) of OCT B-scans of patients with nAMD.
                  The bottom row images (D, E, F) show the corresponding pixel-level importance, where the
                  intensity is determined by the drop in the probability of being labeled nAMD when occluded.
                  Reproduced from C.S. Lee, D.M. Baughman, A.Y. Lee, Deep learning is effective for classifying normal versus
                      age-related macular degeneration OCT images, Ophthalmol. Retina 1 (4) (2017) 322–327, 10.1016/J.
                                                                        ORET.2016.12.009.

                  histograms of oriented gradient (HOG) descriptors. The image is divided into small
                  spatial cells and a histogram of the directions of the spatial gradients, weighted by the
                  gradient magnitudes, is calculated for each cell. For multiclass classification, three
                  separate SVMs were trained in a one-vs-one fashion to classify 45 OCT volumes into
                  15 normal, 15 dry AMD, and 15 DME. Another powerful descriptor of image content
                  is a bag of visual words model. After identifying visual words, an image can then be
                  represented as a histogram encoding their occurrence distribution. This descriptor
                  has been used for a random forest-based, multiclass classification of AMD stages,
                  including nAMD, in a large dataset of ≈1000 patients [63]. Recently Vidal et al.
                  [46] detected IRF on a dataset of 323 OCT B-scans using a set of local intensity and
                  texture-based features, including HOG, LBP, and Gabor descriptors, supplied to a
                  classifier trained on local image patches representative of fluid and nonfluid regions.


                  3.3  Evaluation
                  A fluid detector’s performance is traditionally evaluated by measuring its ROC and
                  calculating the associated AUC. Detection accuracy is also a commonly reported
                  metric, in particular when the test dataset classes are balanced. There are several
                  open datasets for evaluating OCT fluid detection and scan classification. Duke pub-
                  lished an open dataset containing 45 OCT scans (Spectralis) from 15 normal, 15
                  early AMD, and 15 DME eyes [64]. Kermany et al. [44] compiled a dataset with over
                  100,000 B-scans distributed across normal eyes and eyes with nAMD, DME, and
                  early AMD, and released it publicly [65].
   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292