Page 154 - Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd edition
P. 154

ContCultural Theory Text Pages  4/4/03  1:42 PM  Page 145





                                      The cultural politics of difference



                     Hence its supposedly ‘inevitable tendency towards subversion’
                     (p. 33).



                     Said and Bhabha
                     The origins of postcolonial theory can be traced to Said’s Orient-
                     alism, an impressively scholarly account not of ‘the Orient’ itself,
                     but of how British and French scholarship had constructed
                     the Orient as ‘Other’. For Said, Orientalism was a ‘discourse’ in
                     the Foucauldian sense of the term: ‘an enormously systematic
                     discipline by which European culture was able to manage—and
                     even produce—the Orient... during the post-Enlightenment
                     period’ (Said, 1995, p. 3). The ‘Orient’, he wrote, became an
                     object ‘suitable for study in the academy, for display in the
                     museum... for theoretical illustration in anthropological, bio-
                     logical, linguistic, racial and historical theses about mankind and
                     the universe, for instances of economic and sociological theories
                     about development, revolution, cultural personality, national or
                     religious character’ (pp. 7–8). This wasn’t simply a matter of
                     academic ideas reflecting other political interests, as a Marxist
                     might argue. Rather: ‘Orientalism is—and does not simply repre-
                     sent—a considerable dimension of modern political–intellectual
                     culture’ (p. 12). Moreover, it functioned by way of a system of
                     binary oppositions in which the West, its possessions, attributes
                     and ethnicities were valorised positively against the inferior
                     status of colonised peoples. The ‘major component in Euro-
                     pean culture’, Said concluded, ‘is precisely... the idea of
                     European identity as a superior one in comparison with all the
                     non-European peoples and cultures’ (p. 7). Western accounts of
                     the Orient were thus at least as much an effect of the West’s own
                     dreams, fantasies and assumptions about the Other as of any
                     referential ‘reality’ within the ‘Orient’ itself.
                       Drawing on Said’s understanding of this fantastic quality in
                     western constructions of the East, Bhabha drew attention to the
                     fundamentally ambivalent operations of colonial stereotyping. If
                     the overarching logic of colonial discourse was to ‘construe the
                     colonized as a population of degenerate types on the basis of
                     racial origin’ (Bhabha, 1994, p. 70), it nonetheless also set up a

                                                 145
   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159