Page 105 - Contemporary Political Sociology Globalization Politics and Power
P. 105

Social Movements 91


                    a feature of at least some aspects of feminist activities. Furthermore, it is
                    evident that social policy and the law are important agents of social
                    change, so that it is unlikely that any movement concerned with social
                    transformation would ignore the state altogether. Again, it is perhaps not
                    so much that new social movements have introduced new forms of politics
                    since the 1960s, but rather that those forms that did not easily fi t  the
                    modern sociological paradigm have been overlooked so that they are now
                    taken to represent a radical departure from the norm. New social move-
                    ments might more reasonably be seen as marking a change of emphasis,
                    both of orientation and in terms of organization and activities, rather than
                    a completely new form of politics.
                         Social movements have, then, required and contributed to the re -
                    thinking of political sociology as a result both of actual changes in politics
                    and also because they have drawn attention to forms previously neglected
                    by the traditional focus on politics at the level of the nation - state. As we
                    will see in section  3.1 , this re - thinking is evident in the development of
                    social movement research, even in the case of Resource Mobilization
                    Theory (RMT) which began from very rationalist, instrumental premises.
                    In section  3.2 , we look at the competing framework of social movement
                    research, that of New Social Movement Theory (NSMT), which began
                    with an understanding of the centrality of cultural politics to social move-
                          1
                    ments.   The work of Alberto Melucci has been especially important in
                    this tradition, dropping the vestiges of determinism which kept it tied to
                    old sociological models. Although RMT and NSMT began from quite
                    different premises, the former in liberal individualism, the latter in
                    Marxism, they have converged in their focus on cultural politics to the
                    point where it is now possible to synthesize the two traditions around a
                    common core of research interests. In section  3.3 , we discuss Mario
                    Diani ’ s synthesis of RMT and NSMT in the light of our concern with
                    cultural politics. In section  3.4 , we look at what is an increasingly impor-
                    tant aspect of social movement studies, their growth and transformation
                    in relation to globalization.



                        3.1   Resource Mobilization Theory and Beyond

                      Resource Mobilization Theory (RMT) is based on the liberal view that
                    social phenomena are the result of individual decisions and actions. It was
                    explicitly developed on the premises of rational choice theory, to oppose
                    previous explanations of social movements in American sociology in
                    which they were seen as psychologically motivated, as a more or less
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110