Page 229 - Design and Operation of Heat Exchangers and their Networks
P. 229

218   Design and operation of heat exchangers and their networks


          Table 5.2 Design parameters and their ranges (Mishra et al., 2009).
          Parameters                             Hot fluid      Cold fluid
          Mass flow rate, _m (kg/s)              0.8962         0.8296
          Inlet temperature, T in (K)            513            277
          Inlet pressure, p in (Pa)              10 5           10 5
          Specific isobaric thermal capacity, c p (J/kgK)  1017.7  1011.8
                        3
          Density, ρ (kg/m )                     0.8196         0.9385
          Dynamic viscosity, μ (sPa)             241.0 10  7a   218.2 10  7a
          Prandtl number, Pr                     0.6878         0.6954
          Specific gas constant, R (J/kgK)       287            287
          Exchanger length in flow direction, L (m)  0.1–1.0    0.1–1.0
                                                 1–10           N fl,h +1
          Number of fin layers, N fl
          Fin height, h f (m)                    0.002–0.01
          Fin thickness, δ f (m)                 0.0001–0.0002
          Fin strip length, l s (m)              0.001–0.01
          Number of fins per meter, FPM (1/m)    100–1000
          Plate thickness, δ p (m)               0.0008 b
          Thermal conductivity of fin material,  150 b
            λ f (W/mK)
          Heat duty of the exchanger, Q (W)      160,000
          a                                         7
           In Table 1 of Mishra et al. (2009) and Rao and Patel (2010),10  is missing.
          b
           Not given by Mishra et al. (2009).
             In their work, the effectiveness of the exchanger is approximately
          expressed by

                          C max    0:22       C min     0:78
              ε ¼ 1  exp      NTU      exp         NTU        1       (5.96)
                          C min               C max


             They used the j and f correlations of Joshi and Webb (1987, see
          Eqs. 3.275–3.280) for the calculation of heat transfer and pressure drop,
          however, taking the transition Reynolds number Re*¼1500 and the
          hydraulic diameter defined by Eq. (3.246) (with s ofs ¼δ f ). Their optimiza-
          tion resulted in the optimal parameters as L h ¼0.994m, L c ¼0.887m,
                                      1
          h f ¼9.53mm, FPM¼534.9m , δ f ¼0.146mm, l s ¼6.3mm, N fl,h ¼8,
          and the minimum number of entropy generation units N s ¼0.063332.
             Rao and Patel (2010) used a particle swarm optimization algorithm for
          thermodynamic optimization of the same design task. Their optimization
          resulted in the optimal parameters as L h ¼0.925m, L c ¼0.996m,
                                    1
          h f ¼9.8mm, FPM¼442.9m , δ f ¼0.1mm, l s ¼9.8mm, and N fl,h ¼10,
          which yield the better design result with the minimum number of entropy
          generation units of N s ¼0.053028.
   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234