Page 41 - Discrimination at Work The Psychological and Organizational Bases
P. 41

2. INDIVIDUAL-LEVEL DISCRIMINATION
 intergroup emotions provide specific mechanisms that influence the degree
 and form of discrimination toward particular groups.
 Discrimination                                  17
 Stereotypes are both prescriptive and descriptive (Eagly & Karau, 2002).
 Consequently, behaviors by members that violate stereotypic expectations,
 even though they may be positive and instrumental actions when con­
 sidered objectively, can elicit negative emotions (such as fear, disgust, or
 anger). These negative emotional reactions can then trigger discrimination
 to maintain the status quo, which favors one's own group over others.
 For example, stronger perceptions that "Blacks are getting too demanding
 in their push for equal rights," an item from McConahay's (1986) Mod­
 ern Racism Scale, are associated with more negative affect toward Blacks
 targets and with higher levels of discrimination by White individuals.
 Analogously, in terms of discrimination against women, Rudman (1998)
 found that women who were self-promoting were perceived as higher
 in competence than were those who were not self-promoting. However,
 self-promoting women were viewed to be less socially attractive and less
 likely to be hired than were self-promoting men and nonself-promoting
 women. Thus, to the extent that the specific content of stereotypes guides
 appraisals of group members and defines appropriate roles and behaviors,
 stereotypes can determine how people respond affectively and, ultimately,
 behaviorally to group members.
 Besides their expression in overt discrimination, racial stereotypes and
 prejudice can shape interpersonal interactions in subtle but significant
 ways, such as through self-fulfilling prophecies. Regardless of their self-
 reported (and presumably conscious) racial attitudes, individual differ­
 ences in automatically and unconsciously activated attitudes predict how
 friendly White individuals behave overall (Fazio, Jackson, Dunton, &
 Williams, 1995) and non verbally (Dovidio, Kawakami, Johnson, Johnson,
 & Howard, 1997; Word, Zanna, & Cooper, 1974) toward a Black person.
 Furthermore, consistent with the operation of self-fulfilling prophecies,
 and as shown by Word et al. (1974), Black applicants who interact with in­
 terviewers displaying a less friendly nonverbal style perform significantly
 more poorly in the situation.
 The elements identified in the top half of Fig. 2.1 offer a view of the types
 of factors that contribute to individual-level discrimination in general and
 in the workplace. These elements can best be conceptualized as factors that
 influence an individual's propensity to discriminate. The actual manifesta­
 tion of discrimination, however, can be determined ultimately by other
 moderating elements. We consider these influences in the next section.
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46