Page 101 - Dust Explosions in the Process Industries
P. 101

74  Dust Explosions in the Process Industries

            long duct, this may result in a vigorous flame jet entering the process unit at the down-
            stream end of the duct. The resulting extreme combustion rates can generate very high
            explosion pressures, even if the process unit is generously vented. This effect was demon-
            strated in a dramaticway for flame-jet-initiatedexplosions of propane/air in a generously
            vented 50 m3 vessel by Eckhoff et al. (1980, 1984), as shown in Figure 1.78. There is
            no reason not to expect very similar effects for dust explosions.














                 0        100      200      300
                           FLAME JET  VELOCITY  [rn/sl

            Figure 1.78  Influence  of flame jet ignition in the maximum  explosion pressure for stoichiometric
            propane/air in a 50 m3 vented chamber: vent orifice diameter 300 mm, vent 4.7 m2, no vent cover
             (From Eckhoff et al.,  1980).
              The third main reason for preventing flame propagationbetween process units is pres-
             sure piling. This implies that the pressure in the unburned dust cloud in the downstream
            process unit(s) increases above atmosphericpressure due to compression caused by the
            expansionof the hot combustion gases in the unit where the explosion  starts and the con-
            necting duct(s). As shown in Section 1.3.8,the final explosionpressure in a closed vessel
            is proportional to the initial pressure. Therefore, in a coupled system, higher explosion
            pressures than would be expected from atmospheric initial pressure can occur transiently
             due to pressure piling. This was demonstratedin a laboratory-scalegas explosion exper-
            iment by Heinrich (1989), as shown in Figure 1.79.
              In spiteof the marked cooling by the walls in this comparativelysmallexperiment,the tran-
             sient peak pressure in V, significantly exceeded the adiabatic constant volume pressure of
             about 7.5 bar(g) for atmosphericinitialpressure.Extremely serioussituationscan arise ifflame
            jet ignition and pressure piling occur simultaneously.See also Section 9.3.7.3 in Chapter 9.

                    IGNITION






             i                               ”                               ~                                ~


             Lo
             Lo
             E5
             n
             z                                     Figure 1.79  Pressure development in two closed
             0
             Lo       -     /-*-      VI           vessels of  12 liters each, filled with  10% methane
             0
             A
             no                                    in air at atmospheric initial pressure and connected
             E  o      50     100    150           with a  0.5 m  long duct, following ignition at the
                        TIME  AFTER  IGNITION  [msl   location indicated (From Heinrich,  1989).
   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106