Page 111 - Dust Explosions in the Process Industries
P. 111

84  Dust Explosions in the Process Industries


            1.4.5.3
            The Influence of  the Dynamics of  the Explosion Load

            Pasman and van Wingerden (1988) discussed the influence of the dynamic characteris-
            tics of the explosion load on the structuralresponse.Typical dust explosionpressure pulses
            in industrial equipment have durations in the range 0.1-1.0  s. In general, the shorter the
            load pulse, the stiffer and stronger the equipment behave. Some quantitative data illus-
            trating this were given by Kirby and Siwek (1986). However, the energy transfer from
            the dust cloud to the enclosure walls is enhanced if the load pulse frequency equals the
            characteristicresonancefrequencyof the enclosure system.In this case, accelerationand
            inertial forces become important, and the load exceeds the value that would result if the
            maximum explosion pressure were applied as a static load.
              Pasman and van Wingerden conducted a series of propane/air and acetylene/airexplo-
            sions in various equipment typical of  the powder production and handling industry.
            These included bins, ducts, an elevator head, eight cyclones, and a fan housing. The
            observed structuralresponse (deformation etc.) was correlated with the maximum explo-
            sion pressure and details of the construction of the equipment (number and dimensions
            of bolts in flanges, plate thicknesses). In spite of the complexity of the problem, it was
            possible to indicate some quantitative design criteria.
              It nevertheless seems that direct explosion testing of  full-scale process equipment
            prototypes will remain a necessity for some time. But, as illustrated in Figures 1.92 and
            1.93, finite element techniques for structural response calculations are developing rap-
            idly; and if these can be coupled to realistic dynamic explosion loads, the computer may
            replace full-scale explosion tests in a not too distant future.
              Valuable further information concerning the response of mechanical structures to
            various types of explosion load was provided by Baker et al. (1983) and Harris (1983).



            1.4.6
            EXPLOSION VENTING

            1.4.6.1
            What Is  Explosion Venting?
            The basic principle  of explosionventing is illustratedin Figure 1.94.The maximum explo-
            sion pressure in the vented explosion, Pred,is a result of two competing processes:
               Burning of the dust cloud, which develops heat and increases the pressure.
               Flow of unburned, burning, and burned dust cloud through the vent, which relieves
               the pressure.
            The two processes can be coupled via flow-inducedturbulence that can increase the burn-
            ing rate.
              The maximum permissible pressure, Pred,depends on the construction of the enclo-
            sure and whether a pressure vessel design or a pressure-shock-resistantdesign is adopted,
            as discussed in Section 1.4.5. Constmctions of comparativelythin steel plates may require
            reinforcement to obtain the Predrequired. An example is shown in Figure 1.95.
   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116