Page 303 - Elements of Distribution Theory
P. 303

P1: JZP
            052184472Xc09  CUNY148/Severini  June 2, 2005  12:8





                                                 9.7 Approximation of Sums                   289

                        where m and r are nonnegative integers m ≤ r. Here any or all of m,r, and f may depend
                        on a parameter n and we consider an approximation to this sum as n →∞.
                          One commonly used approach to approximating this type of sum is to first approximate
                        the sum by an integral and then approximate the integral using one of the methods discussed
                        in this chapter. The basic result relating sums and integrals is known as the Euler-Maclaurin
                        summation formula. The following theorem gives a simple form of this result. The general
                        result incorporates higher derivatives of f ; see, for example, Andrews, Askey, and Roy
                        (1999, Appendix D) or Whittaker and Watson (1997, Chapter 13). Thus, the approximations
                        derived in this section tend to be rather crude; however, they illustrate the basic approach
                        to approximating sums.


                        Theorem 9.17. Let f denote a continuously differentiable function on [m,r] where m and
                        rare integers, m ≤ r. Then
                                   r           r                          r
                                                        1

                                      f ( j) =  f (x) dx + [ f (m) + f (r)] +  P(x) f (x) dx
                                                        2
                                  j=m        m                           m
                        where
                                                                  1
                                                    P(x) = x −	x − .
                                                                  2

                        Proof. The result clearly holds whenever m = r so assume that m < r. Let j denote an
                        integer in [m,r). Consider the integral

                                                       j+1

                                                         P(x) f (x) dx.
                                                     j
                        Note that, on the interval ( j, j + 1), P(x) = x − j − 1/2. By integration-by-parts,

                                     j+1                              j+1     j+1

                                                                        −      f (x) dx
                                       P(x) f (x) dx = (x − j − 1/2) f (x)
                                   j                                 j     j
                                                     1                    j+1
                                                   =  [ f ( j + 1) + f ( j)] −  f (x) dx.
                                                     2                   j
                        Hence,
                                     r             r−1    j+1


                                     P(x) f (x) dx =       P(x) f (x) dx
                                   m               j=m  j
                                                        r        r−1
                                                   1                           r
                                                =          f ( j) +  f ( j) −  f (x) dx
                                                   2                         m
                                                      j=m+1      j=m
                                                    r                          r
                                                            1
                                                =     f ( j) − [ f (m) + f (r)] −  f (x) dx,
                                                            2
                                                   j=m                       m
                        proving the result.
                          The same approach may be used with infinite sums, provided that the sum and the terms
                        in the approximation converge appropriately.
   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308