Page 69 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd BioTechnology
P. 69

P1: GRB Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN002G-67  May 25, 2001  20:8







              Bioreactors                                                                                 251
































                     FIGURE 5 Airlift bioreactors: (a) draft-tube internal-loop configuration, (b) a split-cylinder device, and (c) an external-
                     loop system.

                3. Airlift Bioreactors                          performance, the riser-to-downcomer cross-sectional area
                                                                ratio should be between 1.8 and 4.3 in an airlift reactor.
              In airlift bioreactors the fluid volume of the vessel is di-  All performance characteristics of airlift bioreactors are
              videdintotwointerconnectedzonesbymeansofabaffleor  linked ultimately to the gas injection rate and the resulting
              draft-tube (Fig. 5). Only one of these zones is sparged with  rate of liquid circulation. The liquid circulation velocity
              air or other gas. The sparged zone is known as the riser; the  depends on the difference in gas holdup (i.e., the volume
              zone that receives no gas is the downcomer (Fig. 5a–c).  fraction of gas in the gas-liquid dispersion) between the
              The bulk density of the gas-liquid dispersion in the gas-  riser and the downcomer. Liquid velocity is affected also
              sparged riser tends to be less than the bulk density in the  by the geometry of the reactor and the viscosity of the
              downcomer; consequently, the dispersion flowsupinthe  fluid. In general, the rate of liquid circulation increases
              riser zone and downflow occurs in the downcomer. Some-  with the square root of the height of the airlift device. Con-
              times the riser and the downcomer are two separate verti-  sequently, the reactors are designed with high aspect ratios
              cal pipes that are interconnected at the top and the bottom  of at least 6 or 7, or even in the hundreds. Because circu-
              to form an external circulation loop (Fig. 5c). External-  lation is driven by the gas holdup difference between the
              loop airlift reactors are less common in commercial pro-  riser and the downcomer, circulation is enhanced if there is
              cesses compared to the internal-loop designs (Fig. 5a, b).  little or no gas in the downcomer. All the gas in the down-
              The internal-loop configuration may be either a concentric  comer comes from being dragged in with the liquid as it
              draft-tube device or an split-cylinder (Fig. 5a, b). Airlift  flows into the downcomer from the riser near the top of the
              reactors have been successfully employed in nearly every  reactor (Fig. 5). Various designs of gas-liquid separators
              kind of bioprocess—bacterial and yeast culture, fermen-  (Fig. 6) are sometimes used in the head zone to reduce
              tations of mycelial fungi, animal and plant cell culture,  or eliminate the gas carry over to the downcomer. Most
              immobilized enzyme and cell biocatalysis, culture of mi-  gas–liquid separators work in one of two ways: either the
              croalgae, and wastewater treatment.               horizontal flow path between the riser and the downcomer
                Airlift bioreactors are highly energy efficient relative to  is extended (Fig. 6a) so that the liquid resides for a longer
              stirred fermenters, yet the productivities of both types are  period in the head zone and this provides sufficient time for
              comparable. Heat and mass transfer capabilities of airlift  the gas bubbles to disengage; or the entrance region of the
              reactors are at least as good as those of other systems, and  downcomer is expanded in cross section (Fig. 6b) so that
              airlift reactors are more effective in suspending solids than  the downward flow velocity of the liquid is reduced and it
              are bubble columns. For optimal gas–liquid mass transfer  no longer drags gas bubbles into the downcomer. Relative
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74