Page 157 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd Chemical Engineering
P. 157

P1: LLL Final
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN003H-565  June 13, 2001  20:37








              Coherent Control of Chemical Reactions                                                      219

                In the weak field limit, the time evolution of wave
              packets in pump–probe experiments can be evaluated
              by second-order time-dependent perturbation theory. The
              second-order solution of Eq. (24) is expressed as
                           1     t     t 2
                  (2)
                     	                        iH g
                 X (t) =−             dt 1 exp −  (t − t 2 )
                  g         2   dt 2
                          h   0     0          h

                                      iH e
                         × µ ge (R)exp −  (t 2 − t 1 ) µ eg (R)
                                       h

                                 iH g t 1
                         × exp −      |X g0 (R) ε(t 2 )ε(t 1 ).  (30)
                                  h
              If both the pump and probe pulses are assumed to be δ
              functions, Eq. (30) can be expressed as

                          	        iH g
                       (2)                      (2)

                      X (t) = exp −    (t − τ) X (τ)    (31)
                       g
                                                g
                                    h
              where τ is the delay time between the pump and probe
                          (2)
              pulses, and |X (τ) , the ground-state wave packet cre-
                         g
              ated just after irradiation by the probe pulse, has the
              form

                       	  iε 0          iH e τ
                  (2)                           (1)
                                                e
                  g
                  X (τ) =    µ ge (R)exp −      X (0) .  (32)
                          2h              h
              In the discussion so far, instantaneous excitation or de-
              excitation by a δ function pulse has been assumed to trans-
              fer wave packets from one electronic state to another state.
              For realistic pulses, the wave packets may be obtained by
                                                                FIGURE 13 A pump–dump control scheme, used to control the
              numerically integrating Eqs. (25) and (30).       branching ratio of the dissociation of a triatomic molecule, ABC.
              B. Controlling Wave Packets                         In order to control a wave packet with tailored laser
                 with Tailored Laser Pulses                     pulses,weintroduceatargetoperator W,whichisaprojec-
                                                                             2
                1. Perturbative Treatment                       tion operator (W = W) that localizes the wave packet at
                                                                a target position on an electronically excited potential en-
              An intuitive method for controlling the motion of a wave  ergy surface. The target operator is one of the fundamental
              packet is to use a pair of pump–probe laser pulses, as  quantities in control problems. There are several kinds
              shown in Fig. 13. This method is called the pump–dump  of target operators, depending on the type of object that
              control scenario, in which the probe is a controlling pulse  is to be controlled. For population control, if a vibronic
              that is used to create a desired product of a chemical re-  state X ef is chosen as the target, then its target operator
              action. The controlling pulse is applied to the system just  is expressed as W =|X ef  
X ef |. For wave packet shap-
              at the time when the wave packet on the excited state po-  ing, if a Gaussian wave packet characterized by its aver-
              tential energy surface has propagated to the position of  age position R and average momentum P is placed on
                                                                                                  ¯
                                                                           ¯
              the desired reaction product on the ground state surface.  an electronically excited state e, its target operator is ex-
              In this scenario the control parameter is the delay time τ.  pressed as W G =|X eG  
X eG |, with a coordinate represen-
              This type of control scheme is sometimes referred to as  tation expressed as 
R|W G |R =
R|X eG  
X eG | R . Here
              the Tannor–Rice model.                            
R | X eG   is given as
                There are many other variables in addition to τ that
                                                                                     
  ¯              ¯ 2
              may be used to control the reaction products by manipu-  
R | X eG  = (2πa )  1 4 exp i  P  (R − R) −  (R − R)  ,
                                                                                              ¯
                                                                              2 −
              lating the motion of wave packets. These include the time-               h             4a 2
              dependent frequency, amplitude, and phase functions of                                      (33)
              the laser pulse. The use of tailored laser fields to alter
              the shape of a wave packet is a very general method for  where a, the square root of the variance, is the uncertainty
              controlling the outcome of a chemical reaction.   in the position of the wave packet.
   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162