Page 276 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd Chemical Engineering
P. 276

P1: GLM/GLT  P2: GLM Final
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  En006G-249  June 27, 2001  14:7







               68                                                                        Fluid Dynamics (Chemical Engineering)


                                                                 arepublishedbymanufacturersoffittingsandvalves.They
                                                                 are much too extensive to be reproduced here.

                                                                 C. Noncircular Ducts

                                                                 The mathematical analysis of flow in ducts of noncircular
                                                                 cross section is vastly more complex in laminar flow than
                                                                 for circular pipes and is impossible for turbulent flow.Asa
                                                                 result, relatively little theoretical base has been developed
                                                                 for the flow of fluids in noncircular ducts. In order to deal
                                                                 with such flows practically, empirical methods have been
                                                                 developed.
                                                                   The conventional method is to utilize the pipe flow
                                                                 relations with pipe diameter replaced by the hydraulic
                                                                 diameter,
               FIGURE 10 Typical centrifugal pump characteristic curves show-
               ing efficiency curves and NPSH (net positive suction head) for      D H = 4A c /P w ,        (162)
               several impeller diameters.
                                                                 where A c is the cross-sectional area of the noncircular
                                                                 flow channel and P w is its wetted perimeter. For New-
                 We have discussed only a very small amount of infor-
                                                                 tonian flows this method produces approximately correct
               mationaboutpumps.Agreatdealmoredetailandpractical
                                                                 turbulent flow friction factors (although substantial sys-
               operating information is available in books dealing with
                                                                 tematic errors may result). It has not been tested for non-
               the selection of pumps. Space limitations preclude the in-
                                                                 Newtonian turbulent flows. It can easily be shown theoret-
               clusion of this detail here. In any specific application the
                                                                 ically to be invalid for laminar flow. However, for purposes
               user should consult with the pump vendors for assistance
                                                                 of engineering estimating of turbulent flow one can obtain
               with details regarding materials of construction, installa-
                                                                 rough “ballpark”figures.
               tion, operation and maintenance, bearings, seals, valves,
               couplings, prime movers, and automatic controls.
                                                                 D. Drag Coefficients
                 3. Fitting Losses                               When fluid flows around the outside of an object, an ad-
                                                                 ditional loss occurs separately from the frictional energy
               From Eq. (63), the mechanical energy equation in head
                                                                 loss. This loss, called form drag, arises from Bernoulli’s
               form, it is seen that, in the absence of a pump head, losses
                                                                 effect pressure changes across the finite body and would
               inapipesystemconsistofpressureheadchanges,potential
                                                                 occur even in the absence of viscosity. In the simple case
               head changes, and velocity head changes. When fittings
                                                                 of very slow or “creeping”flow around a sphere, it is pos-
               or changes in pipe geometry are encountered, additional
                                                                 sible to compute this form drag force theoretically. In all
               losses occur.
                                                                 other cases of practical interest, however, this is essen-
                 It is customary to account for these losses either as pres-
                                                                 tially impossible because of the difficulty of the differen-
               sure head changes over a length of pipe that produces the
                                                                 tial equations involved.
               same frictional loss (hence an “equivalent length”)orin
                                                                   In practice, a loss coefficient, called a drag coefficient,
               termsofavelocityheadequivalenttotheactualfittinghead
                                                                 is defined by the relation
               loss. In the earlier literature the equivalent length method
               was popular, with various constant equivalent lengths be-        F D /A c = C D ρv 2    2,  (163)
                                                                                            ∞
               ing tabulated for fittings of various types. More recently,
                                                                 which is exactly analogous to the definition of f , the

               however, it has been realized that flows through fittings
                                                                 Fanning friction factor. In this equation F D is the total
               may also be flow-rate dependent so that a single equiva-
                                                                 drag force acting on the body, A c is the “projected” cross-
               lent length is not adequate.
                                                                 sectional area of the body (a sphere projects as a circle,
                 In the velocity head method of accounting for fitting
                                                                 etc.) normal to the flow direction, ρ is the fluid density,
               losses, a multiplicative coefficient is found empirically
                                              2
               by which the velocity head term  v  /2g is multiplied  v ∞ is the fluid velocity far removed from the body in the
                                                                 undisturbed fluid, and C D is the drag coefficient.
               to obtain the fitting loss. This term is then added to the
                                                                   In the case of Newtonian fluids, C D is found to be a
               regular velocity head losses in Eq. (63). Extensive tables
                                                                 function of the particle Reynolds number,
               and charts of both equivalent lengths and loss coefficients
               and formulas for the effect of flow rate on loss coefficients       Re p = d p v ∞ ρ/µ,       (164)
   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281