Page 193 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd Polymer
P. 193

P1: GLM Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN012c-598  July 26, 2001  15:59






               702                                                                            Polymers, Mechanical Behavior


               due to the thin bond line, considerable shear strain may  Integration of Eq. (6) leads to
               well have been imposed.
                                                                                   ε t  = ln(l /l 0 ).       (7)
                 Returning to tensile deformation, the principal strain
               or deformation direction is correlated to another common  One immediately notes that ε t  (also known as the Henky
               parameter that is often used to express the level of defor-  strain) is also given by the natural logarithm of the re-
               mation, that is, the percent elongation:          spective extension ratio for the corresponding axis. In the
                                                                 deformation behavior of polymeric systems, the true strain
                            % elongation = ε × 100.       (2)
                                                                 variable is not often utilized and it is more common for
                 A third means of expressing deformation is to use the  one of the other three parameters to be quoted. However,
               extension ratios or draw ratios, which we shall denote by  some data do exist in the literature in the form of true
               λ i  . Three such values exist, one correlated to each of the  strain; this variable is quite different from the others due
               principal axes. These are defined as               to its logarithmic nature.
                                 λ x  = l x  /l 0x  ,

                                 λ y  = l y  /l 0y  ,     (3)    III.  IMPORTANT STRESS–STRAIN
                                                                     DEFORMATION PARAMETERS
                                 λ z  = l z  /l 0z  .
               In the limit of zero deformation, each λ i  takes on the value  The  mode  of  tensile  deformation  will  be  used  to  elu-
               of unity, in contrast to 0 for the respective values of ε i  .  cidate some of the important parameters describing the
               Hence, there is a numerical factor of unity that relates λ i  mechanical properties of a material. Figure 5 is a gen-
               to ε i  , that is,                                eral  sketch  of  a  common  stress–strain  response  exhib-
                                 λ i  = ε i  + 1.         (4)    ited  by  many  polymeric  materials—particularly  ductile
                                                                 semicrystalline materials like polyethylene or polypropy-
               There are certain relationships between the λ terms that  lene.  What  can  one  extract  from  these  data  that  might
               are useful with regard to noting how the dimensions of  help convey the mechanical response of the system and
               a specimen change in a given deformation. In particular,  that  may  be  useful  in  deciding  on  the  applicability  of
               for  materials  that  undergo  a  constant-volume  deforma-  a  given  material?  Often,  the  values  of  σ b  and  ε b  (see
               tion, the product λ x  λ y  λ z  is unity. In fact, good elastomers  Fig. 5) will be of importance since these are related to
               nearly follow this behavior, and since they deform uni-  the stress at break and to the strain at break, the latter of
               formly (homogeneously), it can be shown that for uniaxial  which can now easily be converted to percent elongation,
               deformation along z
                                                                 the extension ratio, or true strain at break. The values σ y
                               λ x  = λ y  = λ −1/2 .     (5)    and ε y are particularly important and should be distinctly
                                         z
                                                                 noted if this “peak” occurs in the stress–strain response.
               The same approximation can often be used to define the  The respective stress and strain correlated with this peak
               deformation of many other materials, although some error
               is introduced, as pointed out in Section III.
                 Although the derivation will not be carried out here, it
               can be shown that if a constant volume homogeneous ten-
               sile deformation occurs be it uniaxial, biaxial, etc., then
               utilizing the fact that the product of the three extension
               ratios is unity, it follows that the true stress in a given
               principal deformation direction is equal to the engineering
               stress in that same direction multiplied by the respective
               extension ratio along that same axis. This can be a useful
               relationship to interconvert between true and engineering
               stress when the assumption of constant volume deforma-
               tion is well approximated.
                 A final parameter describing the degree of deformation
               is the true strain ε t . We establish this parameter by utilizing
               a differential form of our earlier definition of strain above,
               that is,
                                                                 FIGURE 5 Generalized stress–strain curve that shows distinct
                                 d ε i  = dl i  /l i  .   (6)    yield.
   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198