Page 75 - Academic Press Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology 3rd Polymer
P. 75

P1: GQT/LBX  P2: GQT/MBQ  QC: FYD Final Pages
 Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology  EN008C-602  July 25, 2001  20:31






               890                                                                              Macromolecules, Structure


                                                                   The  energy  of  a  given  rotational  state  of  the  C 2 C 2
                                                                 bond depends on the rotational state of the C 3 C 4  bond
                                                                 and  vice  versa.  We  now  need  an  energy  map,  rather
                                                                 than  the  simple  diagram  of  Fig.  32,  in  order  to  visu-
                                                                 alize  the  energies  of  the  various  conformations  of  n-
                                                                 pentane.  Such  a  map  is  shown  in  Fig.  33.  This  dia-
                                                                 gram indicates that the tt conformation (φ 1  = φ 2  = 0 ) has
                                                                                                          ◦
                                                                 the lowest energy. Other low-energy conformations are
                                                                      +      −
                                                                 the tg and tg states (φ 1  = 0 , φ 2  = ±120 ). The g  g
                                                                                          ◦
                                                                                                           + +
                                                                                                    ◦
                                                                                   ◦
                                                                 state (φ 1  = φ 2  = +120 ) is of lower energy than the g  g
                                                                                                           + −
                                                                 (φ 1  = +120 ,  φ 2  = −120 ).  This  is  because  the  methyl
                                                                                     ◦
                                                                           ◦
                                                                               + +
                                                                 groups  in  the  g  g  state  experience  neither  attractive
                                                                                                   + −
                                                                 nor  repulsive  forces,  whereas  in  the  g  g  state  the
                                                                 methyl groups are nearly eclipsed and experience severe
                                                                 repulsion.
                                                                                                       + −
                                                                   It  is  important  to  note  that  although  the  g  g  (and
                                                                   − +
                                                                 g  g  ) state is very unfavorable, there are local minima
                                                                                                ◦
                                                                                                              ◦
                                                                                                      ◦
                                                                 near this conformation at φ 1 ,φ 2 = 77 , −115 and 120 ,
                                                                     ◦
                                                                 −70 (see Fig. 33).
                                                                   The main difference between the n-butane and
                                                                 n-pentane cases is that there are only three-bond, or first-
                                                                 order interactions in n-butane, whereas in n-pentane there
                                                      +          are second-order interactions. These second-order inter-
                                               −
               FIGURE 32  (a) Newman projections of the g , t, and g  confor-
               mations of n-butane and (b) torsional potentials for rotation about  actions must be taken into account in polymer chains. The
               the central (C 2 C 3 ) bond in n-butane.          rotational isomeric state (RIS) model, introduced above, is
                                                                 successful in treating both the first-order and higher order
                                                                 interactions.
                 By  virtue  of  its  simple  structure,  n-butane  has  few  The RIS model is a statistical treatment of all possi-
               available conformations. Once we lengthen the chain by  ble chain conformations in which the bond lengths and
               one carbon we immediately see that the description of  valence angles are fixed. The conformation of a polymer
               available conformations becomes more complicated. In  chain of n bonds can be specified by assigning a rota-
                                                                 tional state to each of the n − 2 nonterminal bonds. If
               n-pentane we must now specify two rotational angles, φ 1
               and φ 2 :                                         there are v rotational states about each of n bonds, there
                                                                 will be v n−2  possible conformational states. Even for the
                   H   H            H  H            H  H
                1                                                common case of v = 3, a chain of 20 bonds will have
                                                                        8
                CH 3  3   CH 3   CH 3      H     CH 3      H     3.8 × 10 conformational states. The RIS model readily
                 2    1   2  4
                H  H  H   H     H   H  H  CH 3   H  H  CH 3  H   lends itself to computer calculation by matrix methods.
                     tt              tg              tg          Statistical weight matrices are used with the RIS model to
                    1  	   2  	  0
    1  	  0
 ;    1  	  0
;
                                     2  	  120
      2  	  120
                            H  H            H  H
                        H         H     H         H
                            H               H     H
                        CH 3   H CH 3   CH 3   CH 3


                             g g            g g
                          1  	   2  	  120
    1  	  120
                                            2  	  120
                 Note that the tg +   and  g  t  conformations are identi-
                                     +
                              +
                                     −
               cal, and that the tg and tg states are mirror images of  FIGURE 33 Energy map for n-pentane for rotation angles φ 1 and
                                                                 φ 2 . The numbers on the contours refer to energies in kcal/mol. The
                                 + +
                                          − −
               each other. Also, the g  g  and g  g  conformations are  minima are indicated by x’s [From Abe, A., Jernigan, R. L., and
                                          + −
                                  − +
               equivalent, as are the g  g  and g  g  states.    Flory, P. J. (1966). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 88, 631.]
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80