Page 162 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 162

144               Engineered interfaces  in fiber reinforced composites






                                     @+ 1) sinh[&(L-z)]    +2sinh(&z)
                                 - Y2            sinh  (&L)               1











                     Finite  element analysis (FEA) is  also developed in  parallel  to validate  the results
                     generated from the micromechanical model. Both the composites containing single
                     and multiple fibers are considered for the present  FEA. The geometry, the loading
                     method  and the boundary conditions are selected to represent  those of the actual
                     experimental  technique  for  both  the  single  and  multiple  fiber  composites,  as
                     illustrated  in  Fig.  4.30,  which  are analogous  to those used  in  the corresponding
                     micromechanics  analyses.  For  the  axi-symmetric  loading  geometry  of  a  two
                     dimensional model, a uniformly distributed constant stress, ~s = 100 MPa, is applied
                     to the partially embedded fiber at the surface (z = 0). The boundary conditions are
                     imposed  such that the  bottom  surfaces of  the matrix  and  composite  medium  are
                     fixed  at  z = 2L,  and  the  axis  of  symmetry  (r = 0)  is  fixed  where  there  is  no
                     displacement taking place.
                       Specific results  are  calculated  for  Sic fiber-glass  matrix  composites  with  the
                     elastic constants given in Table 4.1.  A constant embedded fiber length L = 2.0 mm,
                     and constant radii a = 0.2mm and B = 2.0mm are considered with varying matrix
                     radius b. The stress distributions  along the axial direction shown in  Fig. 4.31  are
                     predicted  based on micromechanics analysis, which are essentially similar to those
                     obtained by FE analysis for the two extremes of fiber volume fraction, fi, shown in
                     Fig. 4.32. The corresponding FAS distribution calculated based on Eqs. (4.90) and
                     (4.120), and IFSS at the fiber-matrix  interface of Eqs. (4.93) and (4.132) are plotted
                     along the axial direction in Fig. 4.32.
                       The  three-cylinder  composite  model  predicts  that  both  the  FAS  and  IFSS
                     decrease from a maximum near the loaded fiber end towards zero at the embedded
                     fiber  end.  Increase  in  fi  (and  the  equivalent  improvement  of  stiffness  in  the
                     composite  medium)  increases  slightly  both  the  maximum  IFSS  and  the  stress
                     gradient, without changing the general trend of the stress fields. For small fi, stress
                     distributions in the single fiber composite model are equivalent to those of the three-
                     cylinder model.  In sharp contrast, the stress fields change drastically in the single
                     fiber composite model when vf  is large. The FAS values in the central portion of the
                     fiber are approximately constant and do not diminish to zero at the embedded fiber
                     end. More importantly, the IFSS displays two peaks at the ends of the fiber, the one
                     at the embedded end being increasingly greater than the other at the loaded end with
   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167