Page 99 - Engineered Interfaces in Fiber Reinforced Composites
P. 99

82                Engineered interfaces in fiber reinforced composites

                    The ENF specimen is essentially a three-point flexure specimen with an embedded
                    delamination located at the mid-plane of the laminate where the interlaminar shear
                    stress is at its maximum when loaded. An almost pure shear prevails at the tip of
                    the  mid-plane  delamination  (Gillespie  et  al.,  1986).  The  major  difficulty  in
                    designing  a  pure  mode  I1 specimen  is  in  preventing  any  crack  opening without
                    introducing  excessive friction  between  the  crack  faces.  The  compliance  method
                    given by  Eq. (3.10) can also be used here to determine the mode I1 strain energy
                    release rate,  Gllc. The relationship between C and a is much more complicated for
                    the  ENF  test  than  for  the  DCB  test.  Although  many  equations  have  been
                    proposed, the one based on the classic beam theory (Carlsson et al., 1986) has been
                    most widely used
                               +
                            2~3 3a3
                       E‘                                                             (3.31)
                             8Cbh3  ’
                    where E’ is the effective Young’s modulus and L, the half-span length. Therefore, the
                    expression for G1lc is obtained for small values of (E’E/Gs)(h/~)2, where G,  is the
                    interlaminar shear modulus (Carlsson and Gillespie, 1989)

                                                                                      (3.32)


                    One of the disadvantages of this geometry is that unstable crack propagation occurs,
                    producing  only  one  value,  or  only  part  of  the  propagation  values,  for  tough
                    materials.  For  this  reason,  ELS  specimen has  been  favored  as it  promotes  more
                    stable crack propagation. For the ELS test, the compliance equation is given by

                            L3 + 3a3
                             8 CBh3
                        E’  = ~                                                       (3.33)
                    and the corresponding expression for G1lc is given


                                                                                      (3.34)

                    In Eqs. (3.33) and (3.34) for the ELS specimen, L is the total length of the span. In
                    general,  interlaminar  fracture  toughness  in  mode  I1  may  also  be  derived  from  a
                    mixed mode test, among which are the cracked lap shear (CLS) test, shown in Fig
                    3.33, which was originally developed for testing adhesively bonded metallic joints,
                    the end notched  cantilever beam  (ENCB) test  (OBrien, 1985), and the cantilever
                    beam  enclosed  notch  (CBEN)  test  (Benzeggagh  et  al.,  1985).  Using  the  CLS
                    specimen, the force-displacement (P - S) curves may be obtained for various crack
                    lengths and dC/da be determined. The substitutions of P and dC/da in Eq. (3.16)
                    directly give the interlaminar  fracture  toughness,  G1-11~. Alternatively,  G1-11~ may
                    also be calculated from the expression (Russell and Street, 1985)
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104