Page 459 - Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs
P. 459

426                            Enhanced Oil Recovery in Shale and Tight Reservoirs


            2.00E-04
            1.80E-04
            1.60E-04                                                   C6-9
           Cumulative Gas Mass, kg  1.20E-04  215 C                    C14-16
            1.40E-04
                                                                       C10-13
                                                                       C17-19
            1.00E-04
                                                                       C20-22
                                         o
            8.00E-05
                                                                       C23-25
            6.00E-05
            4.00E-05                                                   C25+
            2.00E-05
            0.00E+00
                  0    50   100  150  200   250  300   350  400  450
                                             o
                                     Temperature,  C
          Figure 13.18 Cumulative production of each pseudocomponent by nitrogen purging
          from simulation model.


          by the purging gas in the distillation stage (before 215 C). Practically, only

          C20e22, C23e25, and C25þ pseudocomponents are involved in LTO.
             Generally, an LTO reaction is an oxygen-addition reaction, leading to a
          heavy component. The lighter components C20e22 form the heavier
          component C25þ and this reaction is assigned to LTO 1; the medium
          components C23e25 also form the heavier components C25þ and the
          reaction is assigned to LTO 2; the heavier component C25þ generates
          coke and lighter hydroperoxides 1, 2, 3, and the reaction is assigned to the
          NTC period. To simplify the model, these three hydroperoxides are treated
          as the lighter pseudocomponents C10e13, C14e16, and C17e19,
          respectively, and they take the physical properties of their counterparts.
             Combining the results from the preceding steps, the final kinetic
          reaction models can be summarized in Table 13.6.Notethatthe values
          of frequency factor are changed, comparing this table with Table 13.5.
          This is because, to validate the kinetic model using the air purging TG/
          DSC experiments, it is found that the values of frequency factor need to
          be adjusted. One justification for this adjustment is that Barzin et al.
          (2013) found that the experimentally obtained value of frequency factor
          is not exact in their ramped temperature tests. The final model well
          matches the air purging TG test as shown in Fig. 13.19. That completes
          the presentation of an example to build a kinetic model to simulate an
          air injection experiment.
   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464