Page 154 - Environmental Nanotechnology Applications and Impacts of Nanomaterials
P. 154

140   Principles and Methods


           25

           20                3 coordination sphere
          Coordination number  15
                              rd


           10
                         st
                                               of the first and third coordination
            5            1  coordination sphere  Figure 4.20 Average coordination
                                               spheres as a function of the size of
                                               the fcc particles. (Adapted from
                                               Jentys, 1999)
            0
             0   10  20   30  40   50  60  70
                        Diameter (Å)

        smaller than that observed in the bulk metal because of the high pro-
        portion of surface atoms. This effect is dependent on the size and shape
        of the metal cluster. However, the estimation of particle geometry relies
        on an accurate description of the relation between particle size/shape
        and the average coordination number [Greegor and Lytle, 1980; Jentys,
        1999]. In the case of fcc metal it has been shown that the coordination
        number for the first and second coordination spheres are sensitive to the
        size of the cluster up to 20 nm (Figure 4.20). For larger particles the
        uncertainty on the coordination sphere determined by EXAFS is too
        high to accurately determine the size. The average coordination number
        of the third coordination sphere (N3) is more sensitive to the size of
        larger objects, but determining accurately the third coordination sphere
                                                                        1
        requires a scan of EXAFS spectra at a high k value (up to 20 Å )
        [Frenkel et al., 2001], which is not always possible.
          Because metal oxides display a multitude of different crystal struc-
        tures, no general correlation between EXAFS coordination numbers
        and average particle size/morphology has been published [Fernandez-
        Garcia et al., 2004]. In fact, information can only be obtained for spe-
        cific minerals (e.g., lepidocrocite (FeOOH) [Rose et al., 2002].
          XANES can in some cases be used to determine the nanoparticle size.
        Indeed, the LIII white line for 5d metals (Pt . . . ) is at the center of elec-
        tronic charge transfer between metals that are present inside the clus-
        ter. Bazin [Bazin et al., 1997] showed that a strong correlation exists
        between the intensity of the white line and the size of the Pt cluster. But
        the quantitative correlation between size and XANES shape remains
        difficult.
          EXAFS has been successfully applied to determine the size and
        structure of polycations during metal hydrolysis and the formation of
        gels or nanoparticles. Additional examples include iron [Combes
   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159