Page 229 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 229

_.
                                                                        I
                                                                        I








































            Fig. 2. (a) Tempered martensitic microstructure of the blade material; (b) tempered batnitic microstructure of lacing rod.



           the normally expected microstructures. The same reproducible microstructures  were observed in
           randomly selected places, indicating the homogeneous nature of microstructure.  No indication of
           microstructural degradation was thus observed in either blade or lacing rod structures [3].


           3.4. Fractography
            A  low magnification  fractograph  is  shown in  Fig.  3.  The holes, discontinuities and pores  of
           various  sizes were  observed in  the  area  associated  with  the  lacing holes/braze  interface. These
           discontinuities marked ‘A’ in Fig. 3 indicate poor wetting with the blade surface during the brazing
           operation. The small holes marked ‘B’ might have been generated due to galvanic corrosion. The
           EDX was carried out for composition analysis near the microvoids and holes. It was found that the
           Zn content in the remnant brazing material had decreased whereas Fe, although not present in the
           original braze material, was detected. The elemental redistribution of the alloying elements, mainly
           Zn, is indicating galvanic corrosion. Because of high electronegativity compared to Ag, Cu and Fe,
           the anodic dissolution of Zn from the braze material in wet steam is possible. Ammonia present in
           wet steam may also enhance corrosion of the brazing material. It was apparent that corrosion had
           decreased the strength of brazed joint rendering the interface weak, leading to decohesion.
            A high magnification fractograph of the fractured  surface on the thicker section of the blade is
           presented in Fig. 4(a). The crack initiation point is identified at ‘X’. The enlarged view of region ‘X’
   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234