Page 256 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 256

Failure Analysis Case Studies /I
                  D.R.H. Jones (Editor)
                  0 200 1  Elsevier Science Ltd.  All rights reserved                     24 1






                           FATJGUE FAILURE  OF HOLD-DOWN BOLTS  FOR  A
                                      HYDRAULIC CYLINDER  GLAND


                                       C. TAO,* N. XI, H. YAN and Y. ZHANG
                                 AVlC Failure Analysis Center, PO Box 81-4,  Beijing, 100095, P.R. China
                                               (Receiced 22 September 1997)

                      Abstract-A   hydraulic-cylinder gland system used  in aircrah failed by leaking because the hold-down bolts
                      broke  in  the course of  a trial  run.  The metallographic examination  of  the  fracture surface and the stress
                      calculations for the bolts are described in this article. The investigation showed that the failure was caused by
                      fatigue and the reason for failure was considered in relation to the processing, surface condition and assembly
                      of the bolts. Measures to increase the fatigue strength of the bolts are proposed. CJ 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd.
                      All rights reserved.


                                               1.  INTRODUCTION
                  A hydraulic-cylinder gland system used in aircraft failed by leaking in the course of a trial run. The
                  gland was fixed with one hold-down and four hold-down bolts. Three of the four bolts broke in
                  service. The bolts were manufactured  by  turning and threading from  17-4PH steel. The nominal
                  composition of 17-4PH is OCr-17NiltCu-4Nb  and typical mechanical properties are yield strength
                     = 1200 MPa,  tensile strength  ab = 1300 MPa  after solution  heat treatment at 1040"C, then
                  water quenching and tempering for 4 h at 495°C. This paper describes an analysis of the nature and
                  the causes of fracture as well as preventive measures for avoiding fatigue failure of the hold-down
                  bolts.


                                      2.  METALLOGRAPHIC  EXAMINATION
                    A schematic drawing of the hold-down and bolts is shown in Fig. 1. The positions of the hold-
                  down bolts are indicated by  1#, 2#, 3# and 4#. Each bolt head was cross drilled with two assembly
                  holes at right angles to one another. The 3# bolt broke away in the middle of the threaded portion.
                  The 1# and 2# bolts broke away in the head between the assembly holes and the shoulder transition
                  radius. General views of the fracture surfaces taken in the scanning electron microscope are shown
                  in Fig. 2.
                    The fracture surface (Fig. 2(a)) of the 3# bolt was characteristic of a typical fatigue fracture, i.e.
                  there was a crack initiation zone, a fatigue crack propagation zone and a final ductile fracture zone.
                  The fatigue crack  initiated  at one position  in the thread root at a machining mark. The crack
                  propagated  towards the far edge of the thread. The origin mne was rough (Fig. 3) and had many
                  radial lines. The propagation zone was smooth and there were distinct fatigue striations (Fig. 4). In
                  comparison with the fatigue surface, the final ductile zone was smaller and was around 20% of the
                  total  cross  sectional  area.  According  to  the  above-mentioned  features,  the  fracture  surface is
                  characteristic of fatigue. The final ductile fracture zone was typically dimpled. No material defects
                  were found in the fatigue origin zone.
                    The fracture surfaces of the 1# and 2# bolts initiated at the edges of the assembly holes, as shown
                  in Fig. 2(b) and Fig. 2(c). A schematic of the fatigue fracture sites is shown in Fig. 5. The cracks
                  obviously propagated towards the root of the bolt until the remaining cross section became unable
                  to support the load and failed by fast fracture. In comparison with the macro-fracture surface of 3#


                    *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
                  Reprinted from Engineering Failure Analysis 5 (3), 24 1-246 (I 998)
   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261