Page 368 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 368

353
                                                    Stress distribution








                               400






                              200

                              100







                         Key:  + Defect Location 1, x  Location 2,  A Location 3,   Location 4
                          Fig. 6. The local hoop stress distribution  at 0.3 mm from the crack  front for the four locations calculated
                          (Multiply stress by 0.0434 to obtain K,(r) in MPaJm.)



                                                      5.  RESULTS

                       The reason why the crack does not grow at exactly the same rate over its entire front is suggested
                     by  Fig. 6. This figure shows the  stress distribution at 0.3mm  from the crack  front for the four
                     locations calculated.
                       From this figure it is seen that the level of stress at the points marked  along the crack edge is
                     sensitive to the  shape of  crack.  For situations where the crack is concave in direction  of crack
                     propagation (the centre of the radius of the curvature is in front of the crack) the value of stress
                     near the crack tip is higher than that for sections where the curvature of the crack is convex (the
                     centre of the curve is behind the crack growth).
                       This characteristic of the stress distribution along the crack tip explains why the phenomenon of
                     crack growth tends not to be uniform along the crack. During the growth the crack can advance at
                     times more quickly on the interior edge because that area tends to be concave. Meanwhile, where
                     the features tend to be convex, there can be a resistance to the defects propagating. This can occur
                     near the visible surface inside the cylinder. Thus in some cases the crack grows more readily inside
                     the material of the cylinder rather than along free surfaces.
                       Figure 7 shows theoretically calculated crack fronts in a cross-section of the neck region of the
                     cylinder. This presentation shows the following.
                     0  The shape of crack predicted is consistent with the observations on cracked cylinders which have
                       been examined (for example see Figs 2 and 3).
                     0  The crack growth accelerates as the crack grows larger.
                     0  By  the time a leak is detected at the O-ring mating surface at the top of the opening the crack
                       may be growing very fast under the surface.
                     0  Crack growth sometimes appears to be retarded  at the exterior surface of the cylinder and the
                       crack can grow faster on the interior. The most noticeable example of this is the fourth location.
                     The uneven growth predicted for the crack is in conformance with the speculation in Section 3.4
                     above  that  the  growth  of  the  defect  does  not  conform  with  the  classical “leak  before  break”
   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373