Page 380 - Failure Analysis Case Studies II
P. 380

Faiilrre Analysis Case Studies 11
                   D.R.H. Jones (Editor)
                   0 200 1 Elsevier Science Ltd.  All rights reserved                       365

                                               PIk S1350-6307(98)000094


                               FAILURE ANALYSIS  OF  CARRIER  CHAIN PINS


                                    G. A. SLABBERT,* J. J. McEWAN and R. PATON
                          Physical Metallurgy Division, Mintek, Private Bag X3015, Randburg 2194, Republic of South Africa
                                                 (Received 3 February 1998)

                       Abstract-A  sugar plant is designed to operate with the minimum disruption during the sugar cane harvesting
                        season, and equipment must be maintained in a high standard of repair. When failure of equipment does take
                       place, it is important to identify the cause to minimize the likelihood of any future problems. This paper details
                        the analysis of a failure of conveyor chain pins that had operated for only six weeks. The pins had been heat
                        treated so  that  they had  become susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement, and had cracked. The source of
                        hydrogen was attributed to corrosion of other steel components in  the system.  In order to minimize the
                        likelihood of future failures, it was recommended that the source of the corroded components  be identified. In
                        addition, it was recommended that the authors should liaise with the plant personnel in order to recommend
                        a suitable heat treatment schedule for future pins. 0 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
                        Keywords: Sugar plant, hydrogen ernbrittlement, stress corrosion cracking, corrosion.


                                                1.  INTRODUCTION
                   A sugar mill operates continuously during the sugar cane cropping season which, in South Africa,
                   runs for more than six months. It is important that the plant down-time is maintained at an absolute
                   minimum during this period. Unforeseen failure of critical components does occur, however, and
                   repair and maintenance is done rapidly in order to get the plant back into full production. In many
                   instances, it is  imperative that  the cause of failure be  ascertained to avoid future problems and
                   minimize costly breakdowns. This paper details the failure of carrier chain pins from a conveyor
                   used to transport moist sugar cane pulp.


                   1.1.  Background
                     The sugar mill was commissioned in  1994 and the original chain conveyor operated for three
                   years before it had to be replaced due to excessive wear. The new carrier chain  had  only been
                   operating for about six weeks when the chain pins started failing.
                     Sugar cane pulp is conveyed at a temperature of about 80°C. This temperature is maintained by
                   means of steam, which has a temperature of approximately 90°C. The material specification for the
                   chain was either AISI 431 or BS  970 grade 431329 ('En  57')  stainless steel. The hardness was
                   specified as WRC 43 to 45 (Rockwell 'C') although the material specification did not give any details
                   on the heat treatment required to obtain this range. AISI 431 and BS 970 grade 431829 are related
                   specifications, but there are differences, as shown in Tables 1 and 2.


                                                2.  INVESTIGATION
                   2.1.  Visual examination
                     Twelve pins were examined, three of which had fractured. All the pins examined had been in
                   operation in the conveyor for about six weeks. The three failed pins had fractured at an angle of
                   approximately 45" (Fig. 1).  Although pin C failed close to the bottom of the pin, plant personnel
                   reported that the majority of fractures were in the middle portion of the pin.


                     *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
                   Reprinted from Engineering Failure Analysis 5 (2),  121-128 (1998)
   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385