Page 300 - Fiber Fracture
P. 300

282                                                           J.W.S. Hearle













                                                   I
                                                   L
                                Fig. 15. Lateral elastic buckling, from Hobbs et al. (2000).


                under 5%  for 40,OOO  cycles, and polyester ropes under  10% for  100,OOO cycles. This
                reflects the susceptibility of the different fibres to axial compression fatigue.
                  The theoretical analysis derives from earlier studies (Hobbs, 1984; Hobbs and Liang,
                1989) on the buckling of heated pipelines. Thermal expansion causes these to buckle
                sinusoidally. Different modes are predicted theoretically: mode 1 with single half-waves
                separated by straight zones; mode 2 with one full wave; mode 3 with three half-waves
                ... continuous (infinite mode). In  the notation of Fig.  15, quoting from Hobbs et al.
                (2000), the governing differential equation is:
                  y’+n2y +(m/8)(4x2 - L2) = 0                                        (2)

                where  a  prime  denotes  differentiation  of  the  displacement  y  with  respect  to  the
                longitudinal coordinate x, m = pd/EZ and n2 = P/EZ. [p is the radial pressure on a
                beam of diameter d.] E is Young’s modulus for the beam, Z  its effective second moment
                of area, P the compressive axial load and L the buckle half-wavelength. The solution to
                this differential equation is presented in Hobbs (1984), but proceeds by considering the
                boundary conditions for the various modes, whether localised or periodic, and in each
                case gives a relationship of the form:

                  p  = f  (L)                                                        (3)
                The other important element in the analysis is to recognise that as the buckle forms the
                force in it drops to maintain displacement compatibility.This equation gives the solution
                for the infinite mode, but the localised modes require that the compatibility condition,
                Eq. 2, should be modified to include the influence of two  ‘slipping lengths’ adjacent
                to the localised buckle (Fig.  16). The slip lengths form to accommodate the difference
                between  PO, the force remotc from the buckle which is unchanged by  the formation
                of  the  buckle, and  the  lower force  P, within the  buckle itself. The  slip length,  L,,
                is determined by  the effective friction between the beam and the surroundings. If the
                friction coefficient is p, and the radial pressure p on a beam of diameter d, or perimeter
                nd, then:
                  Ls = (Po - P)/(PPd)                                                (4)
                  The analysis shows that the controlling features in the elastic buckling of pipelines
                are (1) the flexural rigidity of the pipe, (2) the resistance to lateral displacement, (3) the
   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305